Skip to main content

Table 3 Student’s t-test analysis of tear proteome from patients diagnosed with pterygium versus control

From: Tear proteomic profile in three distinct ocular surface diseases: keratoconus, pterygium, and dry eye related to graft-versus-host disease

Gene name

Protein

p-value

FDR 5%

FDR 1%

FWER

Control average LFQ log transformed

Pterygium average LFQ log transformed

SE of difference

SERPINA1

Alpha-1-antitrypsin; Short peptide from AAT

2.55E−03

N

N

N

25.8

23.2

0.7

ORM1

Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1

3.01E−03

N

N

N

26.0

23.2

0.7

APOA1

Apolipoprotein A-I; Truncated apolipoprotein A-I

5.11E−03

N

N

N

27.3

23.3

1.1

SERPINA3

Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin

1.69E−02

N

N

N

25.2

23.6

0.6

IGHG2

Ig gamma-2 chain C region

3.17E−02

N

N

N

26.5

24.4

0.8

CTSD

Cathepsin D

4.27E−02

N

N

N

24.4

22.8

0.7

SERPINC1

Antithrombin-III

4.52E−02

N

N

N

25.9

24.0

0.8

PIP

Prolactin-inducible protein

4.90E−02

N

N

N

31.6

29.0

1.2

A1BG

Alpha-1B-glycoprotein

4.92E−02

N

N

N

23.4

21.9

0.6

  1. Proteins with decreased abundance in pterygium in comparison with controls are shown
  2. FDR: false discovery rate. FEWR: family-wise error rate (Holm-Sidak method). Y: yes, still significant after multiple comparisons correction. N: no, not significant after multiple comparisons correction. SE: standard error