| Study | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Vlahou et al. [15] | Li et al. [18] | Li et al. [17] | Mathelin et al. [19] | Van Winden et al. [20] | Laronga et al. [16] | Becker et al. [23] | Belluco et al. [21] | Sauter et al. [26] | Li et al. [13] | Noble et al. [24] | Ricolleau et al. [33] | Streckfus et al. [43] |
Number | 134 | 169 | 176 | 89 | 96 | 16 cancer pre- and post-surgery samples | 62 | 310 | 114 | 95 | 65 | 60 | 6 |
45 patients with breast cancer, 42 benign disease, 47 healthy controls | 99 stage I–III | 61 patients locally invasive breast cancers (IBC), 32 DCIS, 37 benign breast lesions (19 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)), 46 age-matched healthy subject | 49 patients with breast cancer, 13 patients with benign breast disease, 27 from healthy controls | 48 primary invasive breast cancer vs. 48 healthy | 15 healthy | 15 BRCA1 cancer | 155 patients with stage I invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast 155 healthy controls | 81 benign diagnosis, 6 ADH, 5 DCIS, and 22 invasive breast cancer (IBC) | 21 cancer | ||||
4 DCIS | 15 BRCA1 carrier | 44 healthy | |||||||||||
41 healthy controls | 16 SBC | ||||||||||||
25 benign disease | 16 Norml | ||||||||||||
Sample | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | NAF | NAF and ductal lavage fluid | NAF | Cytosol | Saliva |
Array used | IMAC30, Q10 | IMAC-Ni | IMAC-Ni | IMAC-Ni | IMAC-Ni | IMAC-Cu | IMAC-Cu | IMAC-Cu | H4, NP and Q10 | IMAC30 | IMAC30 | IMAC-Cu, Q10 | CM10 |
Differential peaks | Cancer vs. control | BC1: 4.3 kDa↓ a | BC2: 8.1 kDa ↑ a | BC1: 4.3 kDa ↓ a | Cancer vs. control | Pre- vs. post-surgery | BRCA1 cancer vs. carrier | 5.99255 kDa ↓ a | Cancer vs. healthy NAF: 5.2, 11.9, and 13.9 kDa | 3.38 kDa | Breast cancer vs. healthy: 6.5, 8.0, 15.9, 28.1, and 31.8 kDa | 8.5 kDa IMAC30 (ubiquitin) | 18.113 kDa |
 2.95 kDa | BC2: 8.1 kDa ↑ a | BC3: 8.9 kDa ↑ a | BC1a: 4.286 kDa ↓ a |  BC1: 4.3 kDa ↓a |  6.194 kDa↑ | 8.138 kDa ↑ a | 5.83850 kDa ↓ | DCIS vs. benign disease differentially expressed peaks: 5.2 and 33.4 kDa |  | Ipsilateral affected breast vs. healthy breast | 19.8 kDa SAX | 170 kDa | |
 3.68 kDa | BC3: 8.9 kDa ↑ a | BC1b: 4.302 kDa ↓ a |  BC3: 8.9 kDa ↓a |  2.276 kDa ↑ | 5.909 kDa ↓ a | 2.95470 kDa ↓ | ADH vs. benign disease: 5.2 kDa | 3.45 kDa |  CM10: 3.471 , 3.511, 4.151, 4.586, 4.646, 4.698 kDa | (Ferritin light chain) FLC | 228 kDa | ||
 4.27 kDa | BC3: 8.9 kDa ↑ a |  3.892 kDa ↑ | BRCA1 cancer vs. SBC | 5.88770 kDa ↓ | Breast cancer vs. benign lesion: 13.9 kDa | 3.49 kDa |  IMAC30: 3.501, 3.627, 4.147 kDa |  | 287 kDa | ||||
Cancer vs. benign | BC3a: 8.919 kDa ↑ a | BRCA1 cancer vs. carrier | 8.1 kDa ↑ a | 9.01770 kDa ↑ | Contralateral breast vs. healthy breast | ||||||||
 6.43 kDa | BC3b: 8.961 kDa ↑ a |  5.9 kDa ↓a | 8.65720 kDa ↑ |  CM10: 3.471, 3.869, 4.151, 4.646, 14.720 kDa | |||||||||
 7.48 kDa | SLN + ve vs. SLN −ve | 8.95650 kDa ↑ a |  IMAC30: 3.501, 3.627, 4.417, 4.376, 5.890 kDa | ||||||||||
 8.61 kDa | SAX: 5.9065 ↓a 4.0277, 7.4144 kDa | ||||||||||||
IMAC-Cu: 1.437, 1.003, 1.349Â kDa | |||||||||||||
Comments | Using combination of peaks from two different chips improved sensitivity and specificity of detection to 90 and 93% respectively | BC1, BC2, and BC3 were suggested as potential breast cancer biomarkers. They achieved sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 91%, respectively | The study failed to validate BC1: 4.3 kDa | Failed to recover BC2: 8.1 kDa from Li et al. [16] | The study detected a possible BC2 peak at 8.1 kDa which was not differentially expressed between the two groups | All three differentially expressed peaks are overexpressed post-surgery | BRCA1 carriers and healthy had similar profiles | These 7 peaks were validated and tested to differentiate stage I breast cancer from healthy samples, and had strong sensitivity and specificity | Strongest peak was the 15.94 kDa identified as the β chain of hemoglobin | Identified as human neutrophils peptides (HNP) 1–3 | No differentially expressed peaks were detected comparing the affected and contralateral breast NAF in the breast cancer group, which might suggest systemic changes in women with breast cancer | Combining St Gallen score to the 2 peaks led to strong prediction of none elapsing group (p < 0.0001) which could mean avoiding chemotherapy over treatment in 40% of breast cancer patients post-surgery | This small pilot study managed for the first time to detect significant proteomic peaks that differentiated DCIS from healthy subjects in human saliva |
BC2 and BC3 were identified as complement components | No correlation was found between the markers and age, nodal status, metastasis, vascular invasion, ER/PR status, or Ca 15.3 | No correlation between any candidate biomarker and tumor characteristics | 5 peaks were retained by cancer patients post-treatment, whether this correlates to residual disease, poorer response/outcome, or DFS is yet to be studied | BRCA1 cancer had 8.1 kDa compared to BRCA1 carrier/SBC, but not from healthy patients | Interestingly, the same duplicate samples’ peaks were detected on the 3 chips in 90% of the runs | ||||||||
BC2 and BC3 did not correlate to size, grade, nodal, or ER/PR status | Addition to discrepancy in validation studies | Limited study—small sample size, needs validation | Peaks differentiated DCIS from benign disease, ADH and IBC |