Skip to main content

Table 2 Student’s t-test analysis of tear proteome from patients diagnosed with keratoconus versus control

From: Tear proteomic profile in three distinct ocular surface diseases: keratoconus, pterygium, and dry eye related to graft-versus-host disease

Gene name

Protein

p-value

FDR 5%

FDR 1%

FWER

Control average

LFQ log transformed

Keratoconus average LFQ log transformed

SE of difference

IGHV5-10–1; IGHV5-51

Immunoglobulin heavy variable 5–10-1; Immunoglobulin heavy variable 5–51

3.00E−03

N

N

N

21.8

23.2

0.3

PRR27

Proline-rich protein 27

3.10E−03

N

N

N

22.3

25.4

0.7

IGHM

Ig mu chain C region; Ig mu heavy chain disease protein

4.49E−03

N

N

N

26.0

27.8

0.4

HIST1H2BA§

Histone H2B type 1-A

4.68E−03

N

N

N

21.1

22.9

0.4

KRT13

Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 13

2.06E−02

N

N

N

25.5

27.4

0.7

IGHV3-23#

Immunoglobulin heavy variable 3–23

3.58E−02

N

N

N

24.5

25.5

0.4

DEFA1; DEFA3

Neutrophil defensin 1; HP 1–56; Neutrophil defensin 2; Neutrophil defensin 3; HP 3–56; Neutrophil defensin 2

3.69E−02

N

N

N

25.2

27.9

1.1

  1. Proteins with increased abundance in keratoconus in comparison with controls are shown
  2. FDR: false discovery rate. FEWR: family-wise error rate (Holm-Sidak method). Y: yes, still significant after multiple comparisons correction. N: no, not significant after multiple comparisons correction. SE: standard error. § histone cluster (HIST1H2BA; HIST1H2BK; HIST1H2BJ; HIST1H2BO; HIST1H2BB; H2BFS; HIST1H2BD; HIST1H2BC; HIST2H2BE; HIST2H2BF; HIST3H2BB; HIST1H2BH; HIST1H2BN; HIST1H2BM; HIST1H2BL). # immunoglobulin cluster (IGHV3-23; IGHV3-30; IGHV3-30–5)