Skip to main content

Table 4 Ingenuity pathway analysis results

From: A validated analysis pipeline for mass spectrometry-based vitreous proteomics: new insights into proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Comparison group

Pathway

p-value

Z-score

All PDR vs. All CTL

Glycolysis I

2.51E−08

3.32

All PDR vs. All CTL

Gluconeogenesis I

8.91E−07

3.16

All PDR vs. All CTL

Protein kinase A signaling

3.63E−02

2.98

All PDR vs. All CTL

NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response

1.05E−02

2.24

All PDR vs. All CTL

SPINK1 pancreatic cancer pathway

3.63E−04

2.12

All PDR vs. All CTL

Semaphorin neuronal repulsive signaling pathway

5.75E−03

− 2.53

All PDR vs. All CTL

IL-15 production

9.12E−04

− 2.71

All PDR vs. All CTL

LXR/RXR activation

1.58E−37

− 2.95

All PDR vs. All CTL

Synaptogenesis signaling pathway

2.82E−08

− 3.02

PDR-L vs. CTL

Protein kinase A signaling

3.63E−02

3.44

PDR-L vs. CTL

Glycolysis I

2.51E−08

3.32

PDR-L vs. CTL

Gluconeogenesis I

8.91E−07

3.16

PDR-L vs. CTL

GP6 signaling pathway

1.00E−10

2.40

PDR-L vs. CTL

NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response

1.05E−02

2.24

PDR-L vs. CTL

Dendritic cell maturation

1.15E−03

2.14

PDR-L vs. CTL

BAG2 signaling pathway

4.27E−02

2.00

PDR-L vs. CTL

Extrinsic prothrombin activation pathway

1.58E−11

− 2.00

PDR-L vs. CTL

Dermatan sulfate degradation (Metazoa)

4.27E−03

− 2.00

PDR-L vs. CTL

IL-15 production

9.12E−04

− 2.11

PDR-L vs. CTL

Chondroitin sulfate degradation (Metazoa)

4.79E−04

− 2.24

PDR-L vs. CTL

Synaptogenesis signaling pathway

2.82E−08

− 2.65

PDR-L vs. CTL

LXR/RXR activation

1.58E−37

− 3.24

PDR-M vs. CTL

Glycolysis I

1.51E−10

3.32

PDR-M vs. CTL

Gluconeogenesis I

3.24E−09

3.16

PDR-M vs. CTL

SPINK1 pancreatic cancer pathway

5.89E−04

2.83

PDR-M vs. CTL

NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response

1.78E−02

2.24

PDR-M vs. CTL

LXR/RXR activation

1.58E−37

− 2.06

PDR-M vs. CTL

Glioma invasiveness signaling

3.02E−02

− 2.45

PDR-M vs. CTL

Synaptogenesis signaling pathway

7.76E−08

− 2.65

PDR-M vs. CTL

IL-15 production

1.62E−03

− 2.71

PDR-M vs. CTL

Semaphorin neuronal repulsive signaling pathway

8.51E−03

− 3.16

PDR-H vs. CTL

Glycolysis I

2.51E−08

3.32

PDR-H vs. CTL

Gluconeogenesis I

8.91E−07

3.16

PDR-H vs. CTL

Protein kinase A signaling

3.63E−02

2.98

PDR-H vs. CTL

NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response

1.05E−02

2.24

PDR-H vs. CTL

SPINK1 pancreatic cancer pathway

3.63E−04

2.12

PDR-H vs. CTL

Leukocyte extravasation signaling

3.89E−02

2.11

PDR-H vs. CTL

Complement system

2.00E−31

2.07

PDR-H vs. CTL

IL-15 production

9.12E−04

− 2.11

PDR-H vs. CTL

LXR/RXR activation

1.58E−37

− 2.36

PDR-H vs. CTL

Semaphorin neuronal repulsive signaling pathway

5.75E−03

− 2.53

PDR-H vs. CTL

Synaptogenesis signaling pathway

2.82E−08

− 2.65

  1. Pathway analysis results obtained using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Qiagen). All individually treated PDR samples were compared to all individually treated experiment 2 control samples (All PDR v.s All CTL). PDR subphenotypes were also compared to all control samples
  2. CTL control, DE differentially expressed