Open Access

Proteomics analysis of the peritoneal dialysate effluent reveals the presence of calcium-regulation proteins and acute inflammatory response

  • Elisabete Oliveira1, 2,
  • José E Araújo1, 2,
  • Silvana Gómez-Meire3,
  • Carlos Lodeiro1, 2,
  • Cristina Perez-Melon4,
  • Elena Iglesias-Lamas4,
  • Alfonso Otero-Glez4,
  • José L Capelo1, 2 and
  • Hugo M Santos1, 2Email author
Clinical Proteomics201411:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-11-17

Received: 30 September 2013

Accepted: 3 March 2014

Published: 17 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a form of renal replacement used for advanced chronic kidney disease. PD effluent holds a great potential for biomarker discovery for diagnosis and prognosis. In this study a novel approach to unravelling the proteome of PD effluent based-on dithiothreitol depletion followed by 2D-SDS-PAGE and protein identification using tandem mass spectrometry is proposed.

Results

A total of 49 spots were analysed revealing 25 proteins differentially expressed, among them many proteins involved in calcium regulation.

Conclusions

Remarkably, a group of proteins dealing with calcium metabolism and calcium regulation has been found to be lost through peritoneal dialysate effluent, giving thus a potential explanation to the calcification of soft tissues in patients subjected to peritoneal dialysis and kidney injury. Comparison of literature dealing with PD is difficult due to differences in sample treatment and analytical methodologies.

Keywords

Peritoneal dialysis effluent 2D-Gel Electrophoresis Protein identification Proteomics

Background

Proteomics is a powerful technology with high-throughput capabilities in evaluating complex protein mixtures from biological samples[1]. Through proteomics it has been possible to establish that certain diseases can be traced from alterations of certain proteins in plasma[2]. In addition to plasma, there are other biological fluids that contain proteins and that hold great potential to be used as indicative of disease, such as cerebrospinal fluid, pleural, pericardial effusions, urine, and peritoneal dialysate[37]. For example, urine has been used for studies involving kidney and bladder diseases[3, 4], whilst peritoneal dialysate has been used in endometriosis[1], and ovarian cancer[6, 7] studies.

The increasing in plasma levels of endogenous or exogenous toxins is often associated with diseases[8]. When there is renal failure, removal of these toxins from blood circulation can be done by effective methods, as extracorporeal blood purification and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Both methods are mainly used as renal replacement therapy, as artificial kidney, in patients with end-stage renal disease and acute kidney injury[912].

PD produces a fluid known as peritoneal dialysate effluent (PDE). PDE can be used for clinical diagnosis as it contains complement factors, hormones, acute phase proteins, coagulation factors and apolypoproteins[1317]. The analysis of PDE by proteomics is relatively recent. As for the analysis of any complex proteome, the results in terms of proteins identified is limited by the presence of the most abundant proteins (MAPs), and for the strategy followed to circumvent this drawback. The first problem deals with the fact that the concentration of proteins in complex proteomes can vary over 10 orders of magnitude whilst the analytical technologies currently available have 2 to 4 orders of magnitude in dynamic range for protein detection[2]. Therefore, not all proteins can be determined only on base on the analytical technologies available in the laboratory. Different solutions have been developed to avoid this problem, relaying in the separation of the MAPs, or in the equalization of protein concentration of the proteins present in the PDE[18, 19]. The aim is to reduce the concentration of MAPs at levels in which they do not interfere with the detection of other low-abundance proteins. Recently, DL-Dithiotreitol (DTT) has been reported as a cheap and easy way to deplete high abundance proteins to simplify the protein content in human serum[20, 21]. Whichever the solution adopted, this manuscript shows that the data reported to date dealing with the proteome of PDE is somewhat inconsistent, as from five works compared only one protein was found redundant, this is, the majority of the proteins of interest identified are not consistently reported. Both, the type of patients selected as well as the differences in the analytical procedures might be greatly influencing the results. In the present work DTT has been used to partially deplete peritoneal dialysate effluent with success. A revision of the proteins found to date in literature dealing with PDE is also presented and compared with the ones found in this work. A total of 49 proteins have been identified resulting in 25 non-redundant proteins.

Results and discussion

Analysis of individual peritoneal dialysate effluent samples using 2-DE

In the present study, samples of peritoneal dialysate effluent were collect from six patients from the Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense (CHUO). The clinical data of these patients is shown in Table 1. Before analysis the six samples of peritoneal fluid were depleted with DTT as described in Section 2.4 and quantified by Bradford assay (total protein content: P01 4.8 ± 0.3 μg/μL; P02 5.1 ± 0.2 μg/μL; P03 6.3 ± 0.2 μg/μL; P04 5.3 ± 0.1 μg/μL; P05 4.9 ± 0.2 μg/μL; P06 5.7 ± 0.1 μg/μL; see Figure 1 of Additional file1: Figure S1SM, for further details). DTT is usually applied to disrupt intramolecular and intermolecular disulphide bonds, helping to unfold proteins rich in such bonds, leading to their precipitation. As the majority of the most abundant proteins, such as albumin and serotransferin, are reach in disulphide bonds, they are preferentially depleted, although not totally eliminated. Thus, the visualization of other minor proteins is allowed whilst major proteins are not totally precipitated[20, 21].
Figure 1

2D-GE gels of peritoneal dialysis effluent. (A) Representative 2D-GE gels of peritoneal dialysis effluent of each patient used in the study. (B) Reference gel with spot annotation. Fist dimension was performed in IPG strips pH 3–10, 7 cm and second dimension was done in SDS-PAGE 12% acrylamide/bis-acrylamide 37.5:1.

Table 1

Clinical information about the patients tested on this study

 

Age

Gender

Classification

Total time in PD (days)

Kt/V (s)a

PETb

Alb

Ca

P

PTH

Vit. D

       

(μg/mL)

(μg/mL)

(μg/mL)

(pg/mL)c

(ng/mL)

P01

69

M

Unknown

96

1.93

0.84

31

98

61

233

5.09

P02

80

F

Ischemic

45

2.3

0.62

30

94

57

237

5.4

P03

88

F

Unknown

72

1.5

0.76

21

91

30

49

<3

P04

73

M

Diabetes

Unknown

1.9

-

28

110

26

234

<4

P05

54

M

Polycystic

34

2.1

0.75

33

85

59

636

82

P06

51

M

Unknown

38

3

0.82

30

78

49

374

7.79

aK dialyzer clearance of urea, t is the dialysis time, V is the volume of distribution of urea; bPeritoneal equilibrium test; cParathyroid hormone.

In order to analyze the differences among the patients, 2D gels were carried out by triplicate for each patient. A total of 100 μg of protein was loaded onto pH 3–10 strips, and then proteins were visualized with CBB. A representative gel is presented in Figure 1. The 2D gels, were analysed using Progenesis SameSpots software as described in Section 2.9, and 49 spots were detected and analysed (Figure 1B). Gel spots were excised and subjected to in-gel digestion and MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis. Detailed information on the identified proteins is given in Additional file2: Table S1SM and Additional file3: Table S2SM. A total of 49 spots were excised and analysed, rendering 49 identifications, after removing redundancy only 25 different proteins were identified, see Figure 2. Some proteins, such as Ig kappa chain C region as well as Fibrinogen beta chain were found in as much as 7 and 9 spots, respectively. This redundancy can be linked with the existence of post- translational modifications (PTMs) or the presence of proteases in the PDE, which might be responsible for the proteolysis of the proteins, rendering this way a solution rich in protein fragments. These two effects would lead to identify the same protein in different spots. Therefore, and for future works, it is recommended to collect the PDE with a cocktail of protease inhibitors as well as the analysis of PTMs.
Figure 2

Comparative level of protein abundance in peritoneal dialysate effluent.

The proteins identified, an integrative analysis

An integrate analysis of all proteins identified was performed with Cytoscape (v2.8.3). The protein-protein interaction network was imported from Intact (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/)[22] and contains 318 proteins and 340 protein-protein interactions (data not shown). To identify the relevant biological pathways that were altered, BiMGO[23] was used to find gene ontology (GO) classes of biological processes that were enriched among the identified proteins. Thus, the most significant biological pathways found were, (i) acute inflammatory response, (ii) response to wounding, (iii) response to stress, (iv) response to stimulus, (v) regulation of immune system processes and (vi) phospholipid efflux (see Figure 3). Comments on some of the most relevant proteins identified are given below.
Figure 3

Gene ontology annotation, the horizontal bars represent the number of protein identified in peritoneal dialysis effluent and involved in each biological process. The p-value calculated for each biological pathway is shown over the bar. A acute inflammatory response; B response to wounding; C response to stimulus; D response to stress; E response of immune system process; F phospholipid efflux. In the table on the right are shown the protein involved in each biological pathway.

Fetuin-A forms soluble complexes with calcium and phosphate that otherwise would not be soluble in blood as well as participates in inflammatory response[2426]. Furthermore, this protein has been identified as a potent inhibitor of pathological calcification, as mice deficient in Fetuin-A suffers of systematic calcification of soft tissues[27, 28]. In addition to this finding, protein AMBP, also found, inhibits calcium oxalate crystallization. Both, Fetuin-A and protein AMBP are involved in calcium regulation. Further to he above proteins it was also found vitamin-D-binding protein. This proteins is also involved in the metabolism of calcium. Calcification of soft tissues is a problem in end-terminal patients with renal failure. As those proteins above mentioned were found in all PDEs studied in this work, the loss of such proteins through the peritoneum, might potentially explain the calcification of soft tissues in patients subjected to PD. This is such a serious and important issue that it deserves to be dealt with in future research.

The Ig kappa protein found is an antibody, which presents two types of light chains in humans, the kappa chain and the lambda chain. Both types are highly correlated in humans, varying the normal ratio of kappa to lambda from 0.26 to 1.65. High levels of these proteins are correlated with kidney diseases[29]. This protein has been also linked to inflammatory processes in the human body. Therefore, its presence in PDE was not unexpected. This protein could be used as a potential biomarker of disease progression as its concentration could be potentially linked with the status of the patient. Also, the kappa/lambda ratios might deliver information for diagnostic purposes, especially if the ratio found in the PD is linked with the one found in serum.

Retinol-binding protein 4, RET4, and transthyretin (TTHY) are close correlated. RET4 is the specific carrier for vitamin A (retinol) in the blood. The RET-VitA complex interacts with TTHY, being thus prevented the loss of the complex through the kidney glomeruli. The presence of both proteins in the PDE could indicate a failure in the formation of the RET-VitA complex in patients with kidney injury or the loss of the complex trough the peritoneum, and therefore an explanation to problems related with levels of vitamin A in the body of such type of patients is advanced. Also, it would be desirable to analyse the content of the vitamin A in both serum and PDE.

Alpha-1-microglobulin (A1M) is a protein that acts suppressing the heme-group, and it is believed to protect cell and tissues against the damage induced by high concentrations of free hemoglobin in blood[30].

The presence of fibrinogen (alfa and beta chains) may suggest an excessive loss of this protein through the peritoneal liquid, which may lead to disturbed function of fibrinogen and also to bleeding or thromboembolic complications[28, 29].

Alpha 1-antitrypsin, A1AT acts as an inhibitor of proteases, protecting tissues from enzymes of inflammatory cells. Its deficiency can cause complications such as emphysema, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults and cirrhosis in adults or children[31, 32].

Comparison of literature dealing with PDE

The literature available about PDE to date is scarce, and yet some conclusions can be drawn in advance. First, the studies developed to date have focused in different types of PD patients, making difficult a comparison. There is an urgent need for more oriented studies, i.e. focusing on one disease. Ideally, such studies should be done by different research teams and in different countries. Eventually, this would help to unravel if progress of renal failure can be monitored from the protein content of the PDE. Second, there is also a problem related to the handling and subsequent sample treatment of the PDE. This problem is highlighted in Figure 4, where different studies dealing with PDE are compared. As may be seen, although 2D-GE was used as the main analytical tool in all the works compared, the number of proteins found in common between them is almost negligible. It is not clear if this happens because of the differences in the type of patients assessed or in the sample treatment used in each work or because of both. Most likely, both differences influence the result.
Figure 4

Venn diagrams - Groups of proteins per article and mutual proteins between them. (Sritippayawan et al.,[33]); (Tyan et al.,[34]); (Wang et al.,[35]); (Wang et al.,[36]); and the proteins identified in this work.

Conclusions

Through this work it has been demonstrated that the proteome of the peritoneal dialysis effluent is far from being well established. A total of 25 proteins differentially expressed have been identified among 6 patients with PD. It is concluded that studies dealing with PDE are difficult to compare if the methodology used to treat the samples and to identify the proteins are not the same. It has been shown that the DTT-based depletion method is a cheap alternative to be considered to other expensive approaches. The most remarkable result found deals with the lost of proteins trough the PDE related with the metabolism as well as regulation of calcium in the human body. This finding might be directly linked to the calcification of soft tissues, in patients subjected to PD, and opens new insights into the potential use of PDE as a sample for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with renal failure.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

All reagents used were HPLC grade or electrophoresis grade. Albumin, from bovine serum (BSA), urea, thiourea, 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1- propanesulfonate (CHAPS), β-mercaptoethanol, glycerol 86-88%, bradford reagent, coomassie blue R-250 (CBB), DL-dithiotreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide (IAA), trypsin sequencing trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), sodium deoxycholate (DOC) and acrylamide/bis-acrylamide 30% solution (37.5:1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). (N, N, N’, N’–tetramethylethylene-diamine (TMED), ammonium persulphate (APS), glycine were purchased from NZYTech (Lisbon, Portugal). Ampholytes pH 3–10, formic acid, and ammonium bicarbonate were purchased from Fluka (Steinheim, Germany). Hydrochloride acid (HCl), glacial acetic acid, tris-base, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), methanol, acetonitrile were purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). Bromophenol blue was from Riedel-de Haën. Agarose and Mineral oil were purchased from Biorad (Hercules, USA).

Molecular weight marker for gel electrophoresis NZYColour Protein Marker II was purchased from NZYTech (Lisbon, Portugal). α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid puriss for MALDI-MS from Fluka was used as MALDI matrix.

Samples

Peritoneal dialysate (PD) liquid was collected from six anonymous patients from the Hospital of Ourense, Spain. Once taken, the samples were aliquoted in the laboratory and stored at -80°C until further use. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Galicia (Spain). The clinical data of these patients is shown in Table 1.

Apparatus

Protean IEF cell, IPG strips pH 3–10 (7 cm), IEF focusing tray with lid, SDS-PAGE (SDS-Polyacrylamide gel) electrophoresis cell (model Mini-PROTEAN 3) were from Bio-Rad, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The image of the gel after staining was acquired in a PROPIC II DigiLab Genomic Solutions USA. Protein digestion was done in safe-lock tubes of 1.5 mL from Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany). A vacuum concentrator centrifuge model UNIVAPO 150 ECH SpeedVac and a vacuum pump model UNIJET II were used for sample drying and sample pre-concentration. A mini incubator from Labnet was used for gel washing, for protein reduction and for protein alkylation steps. The centrifuge MPW-350 and MPW-65R were from MPW Med. Instruments. Absorption spectra of samples were recorded as microliter samples using a NANODROP ND-1000 Spectrophotometer from Thermo Scientific (USA). Protein identification was done in an Ultraflex II MALDI-TOF/TOF instrument from Bruker Daltonics.

Protein depletion

All samples were precipitated in triplicate in order to access reproducibility of the protocol. Peritoneal dialysate aliquots of 750 μL were made up to 50 mM DTT. Samples were incubated until precipitate was observed. The supernatants were harvested by centrifugation at 14.000×g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The proteins present on the resulting supernatant were precipitated by DOC/TCA. Briefly samples were incubated with 0.02% (v/v) DOC for 30 minutes on ice and then TCA 100% (w/v) were added to a final concentration of 15% (v/v). Then samples were incubated 2 hours on ice. The protein pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 14.000×g for 20 minutes at 4°C. Then pellets were washed 3 times with 200 μL of cooled acetone to remove TCA. Protein pellets were stored at -80°C for further processing.

2D gel electrophoresis

The protein pellets obtained after precipitation were solubilized in 200 μL of lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 30 mM Tris, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.2% (v/v) ampholytes pH 3–10 and 50 mM DTT). Samples were sonicated using a 1 mm diameter probe for 6x10 seconds on ice at 50% sonication amplitude. Insoluble mater was removed by centrifugation (20 minutes 14.000×g at 4°C). Protein concentration was determined using a Bradford assay. Samples containing about 150 μg of protein from each patient were mixed with rehydration buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.2% (v/v) ampholytes pH 3–10, 50 mM DTT and traces of bromophenol blue) to obtain a protein solution of 0.8 μg/μL. Sample loading on IPG-Strip was carried out following the rehydration loading method. Briefly, 125 μL of the rehydration buffer containing 0.8 μg/μL of total protein was slowly delivered as a stipe of liquid on a strip holder. Then, the protective cover foil from the IPG strip was removed and placed gel facing down over the strip of rehydration buffer containing protein. Then it was covered with 1 mL of mineral oil. IPG strips were allowed to rehydrate overnight at 20°C. After rehydration/sample loading gel strips were focused. The strips were removed from the rehydration tray and the oil was drained, and then transferred to the focusing tray. The focusing tray was placed into the PROTEAN IEF Cell. The focusing was performed at voltage: 4000 Volts, time: 6 h30 minutes, maximum current: 50 μA/gel, Volt-Hours: 10.000 V-hr. When the electrophoresis run finished, the IPG strips were removed and were incubated with equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 75 mM Tris pH 8.8, 20% glycerol (v/v), 2% (w/v) SDS, traces of bromophenol blue) as follows 15 minutes incubation with 2.5 mL of equilibration buffer containing 2% (w/v) of DTT, followed by 15 minutes incubation with 2.5 mL of equilibration buffer containing 2.5% (w/v) of IAA. The IPG strips were removed from the equilibration tray and clip briefly into the graduated cylinder containing the running buffer. The strip gel was placed side up and onto the back plate of the SDS-PAGE gel. The IPG well of the gel was overlay with agarose sealing solution (0.5% w/v prepared with 50 mL of Lammeli running buffer and traces of bromophenol blue). After agarose solidification, the electrophoresis was conducted at 200 V (constant voltage), 400 mA, 50 minutes.

Gel staining and image analysis

Finished the gel electrophoresis, the gel was fixed for 30 minutes with 40% (v/v) ethanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid and then stained overnight with coomassie brilliant blue. Gels were distained with 40% (v/v) methanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid until a clear background was observed. Gel imaging was carried out with a ProPicII-robot using 14 ms of exposure time and a resolution of 70 μm. Gel piking were done with the same equipment. Progenesis SameSpots software (v 4.0, NonLinear Dynamics) was used for gel alignment, spot detection, spot quantification, and normalisation for total spot volume in each gel. Data were statistically compared using the incorporated statistical package. Significant between-patients differences for each protein were calculated using Student's t test, considering a p value of < 0.05 as statistically significant and a volume ratio > 1.5 (increase or decrease).

In-gel protein digestion

After spot piking the spots were transferred to 0.5-mL Lo-bind tubes. Gel spots were washed with water and then with 50% acetonitrile/25 mM Ambic until the blue color disappears. For protein reduction gel spots were incubated for 60 min with 10 mM dithiothreitol in 25 mM Ambic at 37°C followed by alkylation at room temperature in the drack with 55 mM iodoacetamide in 25 mM Ambic. Prior to trypsin digestion, gel spots were washed with 25 mM Ambic and dehydrated with acetonitrile. Then, 15 μL of trypsin (0.02 μg/μL in Ambic 12.5 mM/9% acetonitrile) was added to the gel spots and incubated for 60 min on ice. After this time, gel spots were inspected and all the trypsin solution not absorbed into the gel were removed and the gels were covered with 25–50 μL of 12.5 mM Ambic depending on the spot volume. The samples were incubated 12 h at 37°C. Then 25 μL formic acid 5% (v/v) was added to quench enzymatic activity. The supernatant was transferred to new lo-bind tube and the peptides were further extracted from the gel with 50% acetonitrile/5% formic acid. Samples were dried-down and stored at -20°C until MS analysis.

MALDI-TOF-MS/MS analysis

Prior to analysis, samples were ressuspended in 10 μL of formic acid 0.3% and 1 μL of sample was hand-spotted onto a MALDI target plate (384-spot ground steel plate) then 1 μL of a 7 mg/mL solution of a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix in 0.1% (v/v) TFA and 50% (v/v) ACN was added and allowed to air dry. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode using a reflectron, and thus, spectra were acquired in the m/z range of 600–3500. A total of 500 spectra were acquired for each sample at a laser frequency of 50 Hz. External calibration was preformed with the [M + H] + monoisotopic peaks of bradykinin 1–7 (m/z 757.3992), angiotensin II (m/z 1046.5418), angiotensin I (m/z 1296.6848) substance P (m/z 1758.9326), ACTH clip 1–17 (m/z 2093.0862), ACTH18–39 (m/z 2465.1983) and somatostatin 28 (m/z 3147.4710). Peptide mass fingerprints (PMF) were searched with MASCOT search engine with the following parameters: (i) SwissProt Database2012_04 (535698 sequences; 190107059 residues); (ii) molecular weight of protein: all; (iii) one missed cleavage; (iv) fixed modifications: carbamidomethylation (C); (v) variable modifications: oxidation of methionine and (vi) peptide tolerance up to 50 ppm after close-external calibration. The significance threshold was set to a minimum of 95% (p ≤ 0.05). A match was considered successful when protein identification score is located out of the random region and the protein analysed scores first.

Abbreviations

A1AT: 

Alpha 1-antitrypsin

A1M: 

Alpha-1-microglobulin

APS: 

Ammonium persulphate

BSA: 

Albumin from bovine serum

CBB: 

Coomassie blue R-250

CHAPS: 

3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1- propanesulfonate

DOC: 

Sodium deoxycholate

DTT: 

DL-Dithiotreitol

IAA: 

Iodoacetamide

MAPs: 

Most abundant proteins

PD: 

Peritoneal dialysis

PDE: 

Peritoneal dialysate effluent

PTMs: 

Post- translational modifications

SDS: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

TCA: 

Trichloroacetic acid

TFA: 

Trifluoroacetic acid

TMED: 

N, N, N’, N’–tetramethylethylene-diamine

TTHY: 

Transthyretin.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

E. Oliveira and H. M. Santos acknowledge the post-doctoral grants SFRH/BPD/72557/2010 and SRFH/BPD/73997/2010 respectively, provided by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia –Ministério da Educação e Ciência (FCT-MEC, Portugal). J. E. Araújo acknowledges the grant form Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarezde Toledo (Spain). This work was supported in part by Xunta de Galicia (Spain) under projects 09CSA043383PR and 10CSA383009PR and by PROTEOMASS Scientific Society (Portugal). Authors thanks to REQUIMTE-FCT PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2013.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
BIOSCOPE Research Group. REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
(2)
PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, Madan Parque
(3)
SING Group. Informatics Department. Higher Technical School of Computer Engineering, University of Vigo
(4)
Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense

References

  1. Brewis IA, Topley N: Proteomics and peritoneal dialysis: early days but clear potential. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010, 25: 1749-1753. 10.1093/ndt/gfq145PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson NL, Anderson NG: The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002, 1: 845-867. 10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Muller GA, Muller CA, Dihazi H: Clinical Proteomics – on the long way from bench to bed side?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007, 22: 297-1300.Google Scholar
  4. Thongboonkerd V: Current status of renal and urinary proteomics: ready for routine clinical application?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010, 25: 11-16. 10.1093/ndt/gfp476View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrero S, Gillott DJ, Remorgida V, Anserini P, Leung KY, Ragin N, Grudzinskas JG: Proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis. J Proteome Res. 2007, 6: 3402-3411. 10.1021/pr060680qView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tyan Y, Liao P: Proteomics analysis of serous fluid and effusions: pleural, pericardial and peritoneal. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007, 1: 834-844. 10.1002/prca.200700036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Liotta LA, Kristensen GB, Troppé CG, Berner A, Kohn EC, Davidson B, Espina V, Steinberg SM, Flørenes VA: Proteomic analysis of malignant ovarian cancer effusions as a tool for biologic and prognostic profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 791-799. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2516View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stegmayr BG: A survey of blood purification techniques. Transfus Apher Sci. 2005, 32: 209-220. 10.1016/j.transci.2004.10.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghahramani N, Shadrou S, Hollenbeak C: A systematic review of continous renal replacement therapy and intermittent hemodialysis in management of patients with acute renal failure. Nephrology. 2008, 13: 570-578. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00966.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimmel PL, Patel SS: Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: focus on end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Semin Nephrol. 2006, 26: 68-79. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2005.06.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Murata GH, Tzamaloukas AH, Raj DS, Onime A, Servilla KS, Vanderjagt DJ: The prescription of peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial. 2008, 21: 250-257. 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00412.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouchard J, Khosla N, Mehta RL: Emerging therapies for extracorporeal support. Nephron Physiol. 2008, 109: 85-91. 10.1159/000142941. 10.1159/000142941View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Heimburger O, Lindholm B, Pecoits-Filho R, Stenvinkel P, Wang AY: Chronic inflammation in peritoneal dialysis: the search for the holy grail. Perit Dial Int. 2004, 24: 327-339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reddingius RE, Schroder CH, Daha MR, Willems HL, Koster AM, Monnens LA: Complement in serum and dialysate in children on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1995, 15: 49-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Saku K, Sasaki J, Naito S, Arakawa K: Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein losses during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron. 1989, 51: 220-224. 10.1159/000185289View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Der Kamp HJ, Otten BJ, Swinkels LM, Sweep CG, Monnens LA, Schroder CH: Influence of peritoneal loss of GHBP, IGFBP-3 on serum levels in children with ESRD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999, 14: 257-258. 10.1093/ndt/14.1.257View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Twardowski ZJ: Clinical value of standardized equilibration tests in CAPD patients. Blood Purif. 1989, 7: 95-108. 10.1159/000169582View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Righetti PG, Castagna A, Antonioli P, Boschetti E: Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis: the mining tools of the third millennium. Electrophoresis. 2005, 26: 297-319. 10.1002/elps.200406189View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Roche S, Tiers L, Provansal M, Seveno M, Piva MT, Jouin P, Lehmann S: Depletion of one, six, twelve or twenty major blood proteins before proteomic analysis: the more the better?. J Proteomics. 2009, 72: 945-951. 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.03.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernández C, Santos HM, Ruíz-Romero C, Blanco FJ, Capelo-Martínez JL: A comparison of depletion versus equalization for reducing high-abundance proteins in human serum. Electrophoresis. 2011, 32: 2966-2974. 10.1002/elps.201100183View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Warder SE, Tucker LA, Strelitzer TJ, McKeegan EM, Meuth JL, Jung PM, Saraf A, Singh B, Lai-Zhang J, Gagne G, Rogers JC: Reducing agent-mediated precipitation of high-abundance plasma proteins. Anal Biochem. 2009, 387: 184-193. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerrien S, Aranda B, Breuza L, Bridge A, Broackes-Carter F, Chen C, Duesbury M, Dumousseau M, Feuermann M, Hinz U, Jandrasits C, Jimenez RC, Khadake J, Mahadevan U, Masson P, Pedruzzi I, Pfeiffenberger E, Porras P, Raghunath A, Roechert B, Orchard S, Hermjakob H: The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: D841-846. 10.1093/nar/gkr1088PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Maere S: BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to access overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2005, 2: 521-539.Google Scholar
  24. Heiss A, Eckert T, Aretz A, Richtering W, van Drop W, Jahnen-Dechen W, Richtering W, van Drop W, Jahnen-Dechen W: Hierarchical role of fetuin-A and acidic serum proteins in the formation and stabilization of calcium phosphate particles. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 14815-25. 10.1074/jbc.M709938200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jahnen-Dechent W, Schäfer C, Ketteler M, McKee MD: Mineral chaperones: a role for fetuin-A and osteopontin in the inhibition and regression of pathologic calcification. J Mol Med. 2008, 86: 379-89. 10.1007/s00109-007-0294-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinrichsdorff J, Olefsky JM: Fetuin-A: the missing link in lipid-induced inflammation. Nat Med. 2012, 18: 1182-1183. 10.1038/nm.2869View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ketteler M, Jahnen-Dechent W, Westenfeld R, Schäfer C, Smeets R, Brandenburg MV, Floege J: Fetuin-A (AHSG) prevents extraosseous calcification induced by uraemia and phosphate challenge in mice. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007, 22: 1537-1546. 10.1093/ndt/gfm094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schafer C, Heiss A, Schwarz A, Westenfeld R, Ketteler M, Floege J, Muller-Esterl W, Schinke T, JahnenDechent W: The serum protein alpha 2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is a systemically acting inhibitor of ectopic calcification. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112: 357-366. 10.1172/JCI17202PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, Clark RJ, Abraham RS, Bryant S, Lymp JF, Bradwell AR: Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free κ and free λ immunoglobulin light chains: relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clin Chem. 2002, 48: 1437-1444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsson MG, Allhorn M, Bülow L, Hansson SR, Ley D, Olsson ML, Schmidtchen A, Akerstrom B: Pathological conditions involving extracellular hemoglobin: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance, and novel therapeutic opportunities for α1-microglobulin. Antiox Redox Signal. 2012, 17: 813-846. 10.1089/ars.2011.4282. 10.1089/ars.2011.4282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Acharya SS, Dimichele DM: Rare inherited disorders of fibrinogen. Haemophilia. 2008, 14: 1151-1158. 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01831.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lang T, Johanning K, Metzler H, Piepenbrock S, Solomon C, Rahe-Meyer N, Tanaka KA: The effects of fibrinogen levels on thromboelastometric variables in the presence of thrombocytopenia. Anesth Analg. 2009, 108: 751-758. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181966675View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sritippayawan S, Chiangjong W, Semangoen T, Aiyasanon N, Jaetanawanitch P, Sinchaikul S, Chen ST, Vasuvattakul S, Thongboonkerd V: Proteomic analysis of peritoneal dialysate fluid in patients with different types of peritoneal membranes. J Proteome Res. 2007, 6: 4356-4362. 10.1021/pr0702969View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tyan YC, Su SB, Ting SS, Wang HY, Liao PC: A comparative proteomics analysis of peritoneal dialysate before and after the occurrence of peritonitis episode by mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta. 2013, 420: 34-44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang HY, Lin CY, Chien CC, Kan WC, Tian YF, Liao PC, Wu HS, Su SB: Impact of uremic environment on peritoneum: a proteomic view. J Proteomics. 2012, 75: 2053-2063. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang HY, Tian YF, Chien CC, Kan WC, Liao PV, Wu HY, Su SB, Lin CY: Differential proteomic characterization between normal peritoneal fluid and diabetic peritoneal dialysate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010, 25: 1955-1963. 10.1093/ndt/gfp696View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oliveira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement