Skip to main content
Download PDF

Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry in severe rheumatic heart disease (RHD) identifies a proteomic signature showing ongoing inflammation and effectively classifying RHD cases

Clinical Proteomics volume 19, Article number: 7 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. A deeper insight into the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying RHD could provide opportunities for drug repurposing, guide recommendations for secondary penicillin prophylaxis, and/or inform development of near-patient diagnostics.

Methods

We performed quantitative proteomics using Sequential Windowed Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment Ion Mass Spectrometry (SWATH-MS) to screen protein expression in 215 African patients with severe RHD, and 230 controls. We applied a machine learning (ML) approach to feature selection among the 366 proteins quantifiable in at least 40% of samples, using the Boruta wrapper algorithm. The case–control differences and contribution to Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC) for each of the 56 proteins identified by the Boruta algorithm were calculated by Logistic Regression adjusted for age, sex and BMI. Biological pathways and functions enriched for proteins were identified using ClueGo pathway analyses.

Results

Adiponectin, complement component C7 and fibulin-1, a component of heart valve matrix, were significantly higher in cases when compared with controls. Ficolin-3, a protein with calcium-independent lectin activity that activates the complement pathway, was lower in cases than controls. The top six biomarkers from the Boruta analyses conferred an AUC of 0.90 indicating excellent discriminatory capacity between RHD cases and controls.

Conclusions

These results support the presence of an ongoing inflammatory response in RHD, at a time when severe valve disease has developed, and distant from previous episodes of acute rheumatic fever. This biomarker signature could have potential utility in recognizing different degrees of ongoing inflammation in RHD patients, which may, in turn, be related to prognostic severity.

Introduction

The morbidity and mortality of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is chiefly due to damage to the cardiac valves, consequent on an autoimmune reaction to Group A Streptococcal infection (typically, childhood sore throat). RHD is the only cardiovascular disease of global impact that has been shown to be completely preventable [1]. Poor social conditions, overcrowding, and limited access to medical resources are key enablers of RHD, which remains a major source of morbidity and mortality, in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2]. In excess of 40 million people are currently living with RHD worldwide [3]; most are in countries where advanced medical technologies such as percutaneous or surgical intervention are not accessible [4]. The Global Burden of Disease study has shown that RHD affects nearly five million more people than HIV and causes about 10 million disability adjusted life years lost globally.

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is the etiological agent triggering Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF), with evidence of molecular mimicry by the M protein on the bacteria, which shares an α-helical coiled structure with cardiac proteins such as myosin [5]. Antibodies to the M protein cross-react with heart tissues, leading to carditis and other systemic manifestations such as arthritis [6, 7]. The current dominant (but yet to be proved) understanding, is that progression to chronic RHD occurs through a pathway that includes repeated episodes of subclinical ARF in genetically susceptible individuals and interactions between host genes, GAS infections and social conditions of poverty [8].

RHD demonstrates a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs, with no single available confirmatory laboratory test; this adds to the difficulty in the diagnosis and treatment of early RHD cases [9]. Current diagnostic measures for ARF rely on the 2015 revised Jones criteria [10] incorporating echocardiography images of the heart valves [11]; however, the availability of echocardiography is highly limited in poorer countries. A striking mismatch between high prevalences of RHD and low prevalences of previously diagnosed ARF in developing countries has been observed [12, 13] indicating that a significant proportion of ARF cases are undetected, or undetectable with current tools, and there is a missed opportunity to identity and intervene in, those at risk for progression to severe RHD [10, 14]. Given the human and financial cost of this inability to recognize the disease until late in its course, a better understanding of the biological underpinnings of ARF and subsequent progression may present important targets for prevention and treatment. This study sought to complement our recent GWAS study confirming an association between RHD and genetic susceptibility loci in African individuals [15] through the identification of a plasma protein signature of RHD that may aid biological understanding of the processes involved, and potentially point towards economically feasible interventions to prevent severe RHD in poorer countries based upon repurposing of readily available and inexpensive medicines.

Mass spectrometry of clinical specimens using the SWATH-MS technique implements a Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) approach for precision identification and accurate quantification of proteins [16]. Briefly, the approach begins with the generation of precursor fragments coupled with further sequentially fragmented windows across the entire mass to charge ratio range. These mass spectra chromatograms are compared to a spectral library with a spectral scoring strategy employed as an in-silico, label-free protein quantification method. SWATH-MS data have been successfully subjected to various informatics techniques, including machine learning (ML) algorithms, to identify and characterize the differentially expressed proteins from the resultant digitized SWATH maps [17]. Here we identify candidate protein biomarkers for ARF and RHD, by applying ML methodology to proteomic data acquired using SWATH-MS, in severe cases of RHD and controls recruited from peri-urban settings across Africa.

Materials and methods

Study design

Two-hundred and fifteen patients with severe RHD, and 230 healthy controls, of various ethnicities recruited in peri-urban settings across the African continent, were included in this study. A breakdown of the contributing countries and sites is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. There was no age restriction of the cases, and the controls were ethnically matched individuals with no echocardiographic evidence of RHD and who were older than 15 years of age. Case severity was determined by an experienced clinician, who assessed each heart valve lesion referring to echocardiographic images, and categorised valve disease for severity according to the Gewitz/ACC criteria [10]. Informed consent was provided by each participant before inclusion into the study. After the consent process, 5 ml of blood were obtained through standard procedures by a trained on-site nurse and transported for processing to the Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory at the University of Cape Town. Briefly, blood tubes were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and plasma aliquoted into vials for storage at −80 °C. The plasma samples of cases and controls were then subjected to SWATH-MS at the Stoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, University of Manchester.

SWATH-MS proteomics

Samples were quality-checked, assigned a unique ID and cases and controls were randomized and prepared for mass spectrometry by tryptic hydrolysis after immunoaffinity depletion of the 12 major proteins found in plasma. To counteract batch effects following machine cleaning, we repeatedly tested plasma from pooled samples or a commercial standard until the Total Ion Current (TIC) Chromatogram stabilised, before running patient samples. Digitized proteomic maps were generated through SWATH-MS analysis performed on a 6600 TripleTOF mass spectrometer (Sciex, Warrington, UK) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Dionex, Thermo, UK), with specific mass spectrometric conditions (including isolation window size and overlap and total cycle time) as previously described [18].

Spectral libraries were generated by TransProteomic Pipeline (version 4.8.0) [19]. X!Tandem (version 2015.04.01.1) [20] was used to interrogate the SWATH-MS files generated from the samples. More specifically, the samples were pooled together to create a final set of 12 fractions and processed, generating 12 files that were searched against the appropriate database with X!Tandem. These files were further processed with the TransProteomic Pipeline, containing xinteract, InterPropherParser and spectrast, to generate the spectral library. SWATH maps were generated by OpenMS (version 2.0.1) [21] and MSproteomicstools (version 0.4.3). pyProphet (version 0.18.3) was used for the False Discovery Rate (FDR) calculations of the resulting transition groups. Feature alignment tools were used to align multiple pyProphet files with the corrected retention times and FDR scores. As the aligned SWATH maps contain transition-level information, MSstats() function from the R package MSstats [22] (version 3.13.5) was used to infer protein-level quantification. Parameters chosen were “top3” option for parameter “featureSubset” and normalisation with Tukey-Median Polish (TMP). Coefficient of variance (CV) analysis between technical injection replicates was performed on the resulting MSstats-processed data, with samples allowed to go forward to downstream analysis if the median and 75% quantiles were 20% and 30% maximum, respectively. Proteins present in at least 40% of the samples were retained in the following biomarker analysis [23]. The 12 purposely physically immunodepleted proteins were removed in silico prior to statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Proteomic data was log2 transformed to stabilize the variance and reduce heteroscedasticity. Baseline phenotypic characteristics were compared between case and control groups using Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-squared tests for proportions. As some cases were taking Warfarin, we removed proteins known to be Vitamin-K dependent. Relationships between medications prevalent among cases (chiefly Warfarin and penicillin) and individual proteins were explored using Student’s t-tests. Pearson correlation coefficients of protein expression with BMI and age were calculated among case and control samples, and we tested for interaction between case/control status and sex in expression of each protein. An unadjusted bivariate comparison of all proteins between cases and controls was carried out using Student’s t-tests applied to log2 proteomics data; p-values from this analysis were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.

Feature selection was undertaken using the Boruta algorithm [24], which implements a random forest (RF) procedure comparing each candidate feature’s performance in a classification model with respect to that of a randomly created ‘shadow’ feature. Boruta has wide application in feature selection [25, 26] and has recently been applied to SWATH-MS data [27]. Boruta has been shown to be effective in permutation based feature selection [28]. The Boruta algorithm also has the merit of incorporating data from all collinearly associated proteins instead of randomly selecting one among them, as some other algorithms do. Log2 transformed proteomics data were randomly split into training and testing sets in a ratio of 7:3. The Boruta R package (version 7.0.0), was deployed with the parameter ntree, which defines the number of trees to grow, set to 500 and the parameter maxRuns, which specifies maximum runs the algorithm will iterate, set to 4000; these settings were chosen through an initial training of the model on a subset of the data.

In order to test the robustness of biomarkers detected by Boruta algorithm, the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) logistic regression method was applied to the same training and testing datasets as used for Boruta algorithm. glmnet() function from R package glmnet (version 4.1–2) was used to carry out LASSO regression.

The glm() function in R was used to implement a logistic regression (LR) model to yield adjusted betas and per-marker AUCs for each log2 scaled proteomic feature that had emerged as significant from the Boruta analysis. BMI, age and sex were included in the model, as was a BMI*age interaction term. Twenty-three patients with missing BMI information (including 8 controls and 15 cases) were removed from these analyses. The cumulative AUC for the addition of each biomarker, in order of its Boruta importance, was calculated using the Cstat() function from the DescTools package.

Enrichment testing using the list of proteins identified by the Boruta algorithm was performed using ClueGo (version 2.5.7), a plug-in application in Cytoscape (version 3.8.2). The following databases were used: GO Biological Process; GO Molecular Functions; GO Immune System Process; KEGG; Reactome Pathways; Wiki Pathways. Following the approach used by others in similar analyses of plasma samples [29], we used the SWATH plasma reference library of 2,559 proteins as background in our principal analyses (analyses using the whole genome as background are presented in Additional file 1: Data). Only pathways with p-value < 0.05 (calculated using a two-sided hypergeometric test and Bonferroni step down correction) and a minimum of two proteins per pathway were considered.

Results

Demographic information

Among 445 participants in the study, there were 215 cases of severe RHD and 230 controls. Demographic baseline data are shown in Table 1. RHD is typically a disease of young people and as age-matching was not carried out in population collection, we found cases were significantly younger than controls (p = 0.014; Table 1). Sixty-four RHD patients were below the age of 18 years, whereas only 13 controls were below the age of 18 years old. Also, RHD cases had lower BMI than controls (p = 6.02e−12; Table 1). We therefore explored relationships between age, BMI and protein levels in the cohort prior to the case–control proteomic analyses. BMI and age in the cases were correlated with Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.63, compared to r = 0.23 in control samples; the higher correlation in cases is mainly due to the presence of participants younger than 18 in the case cohort (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Subsequent LR analyses were therefore adjusted for age, sex, BMI and age*BMI interaction. Regarding medication differences between cases and controls, 111 cases and zero controls in the study were receiving secondary prophylaxis for RHD, comprising regular benzathine penicillin G injections. Twenty-three cases and zero controls were identified as anticoagulated with warfarin. One case received both penicillin G injections and warfarin. Neither penicillin nor warfarin treatment (after the removal of proteins known to be affected by warfarin) was a significant factor in explaining protein differences between cases and controls.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included study participants. Data presented as median (IQR) or percentange (%). P-values obtained using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Full size table

Proteomic baseline data

A total of 940 proteins were quantified in the blood samples and 366 proteins, present in at least 40% of the samples, were kept for downstream analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The principal reason for protein dropout was abundance level, rather than unacceptable levels of variation. Among these 366 proteins, no significant differences of protein expression were observed between participants taking warfarin or penicillin, compared to those not taking medication (pairwise t-test, adjusted p-value = 1). Correlation coefficients of protein expression and BMI or age were in general weak, and not systematically different between cases and controls (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). No protein showed significantly different expression in males than in females, and there were no significant interactions between case/control status and sex in protein expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S4).

Boruta machine learning analyses

Fold change analyses showed a total of 84 proteins that exhibited significant differences between cases and controls with adjusted p-values < 0.05 (Additional file 1: Table S2). Using the Boruta algorithm, 56 features were identified as important; these are presented in order of their Boruta importance in Table 2. Figure 1a shows the boxplots of the permutation importance of the 56 proteins in order with an emphasis on the top six proteins. Adiponectin (Q15848) and complement factor C7 (P10643) are the strongest differentially expressed proteins in this analysis, followed by quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (O00391), insulin-like growth factor binding protein acid labile subunit (P35858), pregnancy zone protein (P20742) and glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1 (P80108). Twenty-four of the proteins identified by the Boruta algorithm were also identified by LASSO regression (Additional file 1: Table S3). However, the Boruta algorithm identified some important additional biomarkers, for example, quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (O00391), a known marker of cardiac disease, that LASSO regression did not detect.

Table 2 List of biomarkers identified from Boruta package with their log2-scaled mean expression in cases, controls, log2 fold change, mean permutation importance (meanImp); and with Odds Ratios (ORs), 95% Confidence Interval (CI), p-values and AUCs from single-marker LR models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and age*BMI
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Boxplot representing the permutation importance of the 56 proteins (from 215 cases; 230 controls) found to be significant by the Boruta algorithm. UniProt IDs are presented in Table 2. b Cumulative AUC for Boruta-identified biomarkers calculated from logistic regression analysis

Full size image

Logistic regression

Results of the marker-by-marker logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, BMI and age*BMI, for each of the 56 proteins identified by the Boruta algorithm, are presented in Table 2. The top marker from the Boruta analyses, Adiponectin, was higher in cases than controls, exhibiting an OR for disease per unit increase on the log2 scale (ie per doubling) of 1.18 [95% CI 1.13–1.24]; p = 2.00e−12. The second placed marker by the Boruta algorithm, complement component C7, had the highest absolute case–control difference of any biomarker in the LR model, with OR = 3.40 [95% CI 2.41–4.93]; p = 2.14e−11. Among other significant markers, Fibulin-1, a known component of cardiac valve matrix, was higher in cases than controls, potentially indicating ongoing significant valve damage in these chronic RHD patients (OR = 1.96; [95% CI 1.46–2.68]; p = 1.44e−05). Also, in keeping with previous analyses [30], we found the complement-activating protein Ficolin-3 to be lower in cases than controls (OR = 0.60; [95% CI 0.47–0.76]; p = 2.65e−05). Ficolin-3 had a strong classification ability similar to Adiponectin and C7 with an individual AUC of 0.81. The cumulative AUC from the logistic regression analyses is shown in Fig. 1b. Incorporating the top 6 biomarkers in the model yielded an AUC of over 90% and incorporating the top 12 biomarkers yielded an AUC of ~ 0.95 (Table 2). Thus, the use of SWATH-MS based discovery proteomics identified a candidate biomarker signature that accurately discriminates RHD patients from controls.

Pathway enrichment

Statistically significantly enriched pathways identified by ClueGo functional enrichment conducted on the Boruta-identified proteins are presented in Additional file 1: Table S4. A functionally grouped network of pathways is shown in Fig. 2. Enriched pathways confirmed our inference from the individual protein analyses that the activity of protein networks involved in inflammatory mechanisms were significantly different between cases and controls. For example, proteins involved in the Insulin like Growth Factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) pathways were significantly enriched (FDR-adjusted p = 1.70e−04) which are of known importance in autoimmunity [31]. Pathways of previously unsuspected relevance in RHD included serine-type endopeptidase inhibitors (FDR-adjusted p = 4.94e−05), including members of the Serpin family involved in stabilization of the extracellular matrix and inhibiting clotting proteins; and lipoprotein metabolism (FDR-adjusted p = 1.30e−04). Subsidiary analyses using the whole genome as background produced results highly congruent with the plasma reference library analyses (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functionally grouped networks of enriched pathways from ClueGO. For the full enrichment analysis results see Additional file 1: Table S4

Full size image

Discussion

In this study of geographically and ethnically diverse African patients with severe RHD and healthy controls, we identified a proteomic signature consistent with ongoing inflammation, during what has typically been considered a “burned out” phase of disease—when severe chronic valve disease is established.

Previous plasma proteomic studies of RHD have involved smaller numbers of patients than the present study: Mukherjee et al. [32] studied six patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and six controls; Gao et al. [33] studied 40 RHD patients and 40 controls; and Wu et al. [34] carried out the only previous study of comparable size to the present investigation, involving 160 RHD patients and 160 healthy controls. There was minimal overlap between the proteins identified in those studies and the present investigation, which is the first to employ a machine learning approach to identify differentially expressed proteins. Proteomic studies of rheumatic human valves replaced at surgery offer the potential to more directly interrogate pathological processes, however these have involved only small numbers of patients, due to limited availability of specimens for study (recently reviewed by Lumngwena et al. [35]). Moreover, while such studies of valve tissue provide directly pathologically relevant information, they do not necessarily inform the basis for a potential field diagnostic. In the following, we discuss certain of the proteins that showed most significant differences between cases and controls and their potential relevance to RHD.

Adiponectin was the top protein identified in the Boruta and logistic regression analyses. Plasma adiponectin was a mean of 2.2 fold higher in cases than controls. Adiponectin has a complex relationship to inflammation, being currently thought to act as either an anti-inflammatory or a pro-inflammatory protein dependent on context [36]. In the context of diabetes, obesity and coronary artery disease, adiponectin is lower in cases than controls and inversely correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. By contrast, levels are higher in cases of rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and inflammatory bowel disease than controls. Thus elevation of adiponectin appears to be a specific autoimmune marker in the context of inflammation, in keeping with the disease process in RHD.

Complement factor 7 was the second most important protein in the Boruta and logistic regression analyses. Plasma C7 was a mean 1.6 fold higher in cases than controls. Unlike some other complement components, C7 is not considered an acute phase reactant, and it is the only terminal complement component not predominantly synthesised by hepatocytes [37]. C7 is often the limiting factor for terminal complement complex generation, and has been found at higher levels in plasma of diabetic patients with kidney disease [38]. Thus far there is no evidence for plasma C7 levels being altered in rheumatoid or autoimmune diseases. The combination of Adiponectin and C7 elevation in cases compared with controls together is therefore, to the best of our knowledge, unique to RHD among inflammatory diseases studied so far, and suggests their combination could have diagnostic utility.

Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1) was the third most important protein in the machine learning analyses. QSOX1 was on average 43% higher in cases than in controls. When fully adjusted for age/sex/BMI/age*BMI in logistic regression analyses, it fell to 29th position among the identified proteins, but remained statistically significantly different between cases and controls (OR = 1.27 [95% CI 1.12–1.47]; p = 5.58e−04). QSOX1 catalyses disulphide bond formation in fibroblasts, and supports ECM assembly in fibroblast cultures. It has been described as a marker of acute heart failure [39] and is higher in patients admitted with MI who later go on to develop LV dysfunction [40], in which situation it is thought to originate from the infarct border zone. QSOX1 has not previously been implicated in rheumatic or other heart valve disease.

Fibulin-1 is an extracellular matrix protein strongly expressed during development in the cardiac cushions, from which the heart valves develop, and in adult valve tissue [41, 42]. Plasma fibulin-1 levels have been suggested to be an early plasma marker of aortic stenosis [43]. Levels have been positively associated with N-terminal pro-BNP, and left atrial size [44], and fibulin is hypothesised to play a key role in determining aortic stiffness [45]. Our data showing a 46% higher mean value plasma fibulin-1 in RHD cases compared to controls, particularly when coupled with the pro-inflammatory signature constituted by other proteins, tends to support the notion of ongoing valve damage in late-stage RHD. However, this observation could also be consistent with left atrial size increase consequent upon mitral stenosis or regurgitation among a proportion of the cases.

We found Ficolin-3 levels to be about 43% lower in RHD cases than controls. Ficolin-3 is one of three ficolin proteins that bind to microbial surface residues, and play key roles together with the Mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine proteases 1 and 2 in the cleavage of complement components 4 and 2 to form the C3 convertase C4b2a [46]. The lectin pathway, of which Ficolin-3 is the most abundant plasma component, has been implicated in RHD by multiple previous studies; Ficolin 3 itself binds to the highly conserved N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) antigen, the main carbohydrate antigen of the Group A Streptococcus cell wall. Recently, a focused ELISA based study of serum Ficolin-3 concentrations showed a 30% lower serum ficolin-3 among 179 patients with a history of rheumatic fever compared to 170 healthy controls, a result strongly in concordance with our large-hypothesis experiment [30]; although a smaller recent study of Egyptian adolescents did not confirm this result [47]. It is possible that either consumption of Ficolin-3 by an ongoing inflammatory process, or a genetic predisposition to lower Ficolin-3 levels resulting in a greater propensity for streptococcal sore throat to progress to acute rheumatic fever among cases, may explain the association we and others have shown between severe RHD and lower plasma Ficolin-3. Further research will be required to distinguish these possibilities.

Taken together, our results strongly suggest an ongoing inflammatory process involving damage to the cardiac valves among these cases of severe RHD, which to date has remained an unresolved question. Of note, over 50% of the case population were treated with secondary penicillin prophylaxis, and we observed no difference in proteomic profile among those cases who were, and who were not, taking penicillin prophylaxis. This suggests that recent undiagnosed episodes of rheumatic fever would be an unlikely explanation for our observations. This is important in light of alternative plausible hypotheses for the drivers of progressive valve severity that are emerging. For example there is previous work showing that myocarditis remained in its active phase in patients with ARF, months after the disease ventured into the quiescent phase [48] suggesting that continuous valve damage may occur in a similar fashion in chronic RHD patients, with evidence of a continuum of inflammation due to the presence of high levels of CRP [49]. Elsewhere Karthikeyan and colleagues have suggested that a major driver of persistent inflammation and progression of valve disease may be related to the hemodynamic burden and turbulence created by transvalvular pressure gradients across damaged valves [50]. Of interest, Rifaie et al. reported that high concentrations of inflammatory markers present in the sera of patients with chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease subsequently disappeared after administration of anti-inflammatory drugs [51]. Clinical observation tends to support the notion of ongoing valve damage distant from ARF episodes—for example, while pure mitral regurgitation dominates in the young, mixed valvular pathology is the most common finding in chronic RHD, indicating progression [52]. Our results suggest these clinical changes reflect ongoing inflammation-driven valvular scarring and remodelling occurring in RHD, even distant from recurrent episodes of ARF.

Our analyses were able to distinguish a six-protein signature of severe RHD (ADIPOQ, C7, QSOX1, IGFALS, PZP, GPLD1) that correctly classified over 90% of cases; incorporation of the top 12 proteins enabled correct classification of over 95% of cases. Certain features of the signature appear, from the literature, to confer specificity—the combination of high Adiponectin and high C7, higher levels of Fibulin-1, and lower levels of Ficolin-3 in cases. If ongoing inflammation were shown to have prognostic importance in chronic RHD, the protein signature could be used to attempt to stratify RHD patients, and potentially identify opportunities for drug repurposing in future studies. A similar protein signature identifying ARF would be of even greater utility in low-resource settings, where access to experts trained in clinical cardiovascular evaluation, and the use of echocardiography, is very limited. Similar studies to ours will be necessary in ARF patients and controls to investigate this question.

This study has limitations. Although it is the largest study thus far, the only one to date to incorporate machine learning, and the first to use the SWATH-MS or proteomics methodology, replication of our findings in a second cohort of similar size would be of value. Incorporation of genetic information could enable a “Mendelian randomisation” approach to distinguish causal from non-causal association—this could be of particular value, for example, in the case of Ficolin-3 where lower levels could be due to either genetic predisposition or enhanced consumption by an ongoing inflammatory process. Such experiments would require larger samples. Adiponectin exists in three isoforms (trimer, hexamer and multimer) which are known to have differential properties in, for example, induction of chemokine expression in vitro [53]. Our approach could not distinguish these different isoforms, which would require alternative analytic platforms. It is therefore possible that we have underestimated the importance of a particular isoform of Adiponectin. Some of the proteins we identified as among the strongest biomarkers do not, as yet, have plausible mechanisms linking them to RHD; further research will be required to discover these.

In summary, we have identified a plasma protein signature of rheumatic heart disease that suggests an ongoing inflammatory process in the chronic phase of the condition. A small number of proteins considered together accurately classified chronic, severe RHD cases distinct from healthy controls. This work may could contribute to opportunities for drug repurposing, guide recommendations for prophylaxis, and/or inform development of near-patient diagnostics.

Availability of data and materials

Scripts and processed data accompanying the paper are available on the github repository: https://github.com/jyangUK/Rheumatic_heart_disease.

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [56] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030598. Data access will be limited to the purpose of Rheumatic Heart Disease research, per ethical permissions for our study, and regulated by a Data Access Committee (Chair: ME). Further details on data accessibility are available from the Corresponding Author.

References

  1. Zühlke LJ, Beaton A, Engel ME, Hugo-Hamman CT, Karthikeyan G, Katzenellenbogen JM, Ntusi N, Ralph AP, Saxena A, Smeesters PR. Group A streptococcus, acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: epidemiology and clinical considerations. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(2):15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Watkins DA, Zuhlke LJ, Engel ME, Mayosi BMJS. Rheumatic fever: neglected again. Science. 2009;324(5923):37–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, Barengo NC, Beaton AZ, Benjamin EJ, Benziger CP, Bonny A, Brauer M, Brodmann M, Cahill TJ, Carapetis J, Catapano AL, Chugh SS, Cooper LT, Coresh J, Criqui M, DeCleene N, Eagle KA, Emmons-Bell S, Feigin VL, Fernandez-Sola J, Fowkes G, Gakidou E, Grundy SM, He FJ, Howard G, Hu F, Inker L, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Koroshetz W, Lavie C, Lloyd-Jones D, Lu HS, Mirijello A, Temesgen AM, Mokdad A, Moran AE, Muntner P, Narula J, Neal B, Ntsekhe M, Moraes de Oliveira G, Otto C, Owolabi M, Pratt M, Rajagopalan S, Reitsma M, Ribeiro ALP, Rigotti N, Rodgers A, Sable C, Shakil S, Sliwa-Hahnle K, Stark B, Sundstrom J, Timpel P, Tleyjeh IM, Valgimigli M, Vos T, Whelton PK, Yacoub M, Zuhlke L, Murray C, Fuster V, Group G-N-JGBoCDW. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carapetis JR, Zuhlke L, Taubert K, Narula J. Continued challenge of rheumatic heart disease: the gap of understanding or the gap of implementation? Glob Heart. 2013;8(3):185–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carapetis JR, Beaton A, Cunningham MW, Guilherme L, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, Sable C, Steer A, Wilson N, Wyber R, Zuhlke L. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15084.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Faé KC, da Silva DD, Oshiro SE, Tanaka AC, Pomerantzeff PM, Douay C, Charron D, Toubert A, Cunningham MW, Kalil J. Mimicry in recognition of cardiac myosin peptides by heart-intralesional T cell clones from rheumatic heart disease. J Immunol. 2006;176(9):5662–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guilherme L, Cunha-Neto E, Coelho V, Snitcowsky R, Pomerantzeff P, Assis R, Pedra F, Neumann J, Goldberg A, Patarroyo M. Human heart–infiltrating T-Cell clones from rheumatic heart disease patients recognize both streptococcal and cardiac proteins. Circulation. 1995;92(3):415–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(11):685–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuhlke LJ, Engel ME, Watkins D, Mayosi BM. Incidence, prevalence and outcome of rheumatic heart disease in South Africa: a systematic review of contemporary studies. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:375–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gewitz MH, Baltimore RS, Tani LY, Sable CA, Shulman ST, Carapetis J, Remenyi B, Taubert KA, Bolger AF, Beerman L. Revision of the Jones Criteria for the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever in the era of Doppler echocardiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(20):1806–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tubridy-Clark M, Carapetis JR. Subclinical carditis in rheumatic fever: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2007;119(1):54–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okello E, Wanzhu Z, Musoke C, Kakande B, Mondo CK, Freers J, Twalib A, Lwabi P, Wilson NB, Odoi-Adome R. Cardiovascular complications in newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease patients at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013;24(3):82.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergmark R, Bergmark B, Blander J, Fataki M, Janabi M. Burden of disease and barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of group a beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis for the prevention of rheumatic heart disease in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29(12):1135–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaton A, Carapetis J. The 2015 revision of the Jones criteria for the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever: implications for practice in low-income and middle-income countries. Heart Asia. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2015-010648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Machipisa T, Chong M, Muhamed B, Chishala C, Shaboodien G, Pandie S, de Vries J, Laing N, Joachim A, Daniels R, Ntsekhe M, Hugo-Hamman CT, Gitura B, Ogendo S, Lwabi P, Okello E, Damasceno A, Novela C, Mocumbi AO, Madeira G, Musuku J, Mtaja A, ElSayed A, Elhassan HHM, Bode-Thomas F, Okeahialam BN, Zuhlke LJ, Mulder N, Ramesar R, Lesosky M, Parks T, Cordell HJ, Keavney B, Engel ME, Pare G. Association of novel locus with rheumatic heart disease in black african individuals: findings from the RHDGen study. JAMA Cardiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Rost H, Selevsek N, Reiter L, Bonner R, Aebersold R. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(6):O111.016717.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Swan AL, Mobasheri A, Allaway D, Liddell S, Bacardit J. Application of machine learning to proteomics data: classification and biomarker identification in postgenomics biology. OMICS. 2013;17(12):595–610.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Geary B, Walker MJ, Snow JT, Lee DC, Pernemalm M, Maleki-Dizaji S, Azadbakht N, Apostolidou S, Barnes J, Krysiak P. Identification of a biomarker panel for early detection of lung cancer patients. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(9):3369–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deutsch EW, Mendoza L, Shteynberg D, Farrah T, Lam H, Tasman N, Sun Z, Nilsson E, Pratt B, Prazen B. A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics. 2010;10(6):1150–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bjornson RD, Carriero NJ, Colangelo C, Shifman M, Cheung KH, Miller PL, Williams K. X!!Tandem, an improved method for running X!tandem in parallel on collections of commodity computers. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(1):293–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rost HL, Rosenberger G, Navarro P, Gillet L, Miladinovic SM, Schubert OT, Wolski W, Collins BC, Malmstrom J, Malmstrom L, Aebersold R. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(3):219–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi M, Chang C-Y, Clough T, Broudy D, Killeen T, MacLean B, Vitek OJB. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(17):2524–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Arioli A, Dagliati A, Geary B, Peek N, Kalra PA, Whetton AD, Geifman N. OptiMissP: A dashboard to assess missingness in proteomic data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(4): e0249771.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(11):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Di Franco A, Thiriet P, Di Carlo G, Dimitriadis C, Francour P, Gutiérrez NL, De Grissac AJ, Koutsoubas D, Milazzo M, del Mar OM. Five key attributes can increase marine protected areas performance for small-scale fisheries management. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 2019;13(2):413–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortea I, Ruiz-Sánchez I, Cañete R, Caballero-Villarraso J, Cañete MD. Identification of candidate serum biomarkers of childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency using SWATH-MS and feature selection. J Proteomics. 2018;175:105–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Acharjee A, Larkman J, Xu Y, Cardoso VR, Gkoutos GV. A random forest based biomarker discovery and power analysis framework for diagnostics research. BMC Med Genomics. 2020;13(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Buil A, Collins BC, Gillet LC, Blum LC, Cheng LY, Vitek O, Mouritsen J, Lachance G, Spector TD. Quantitative variability of 342 plasma proteins in a human twin population. Mol Syst Biol. 2015;11(2):786.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Catarino SJ, Andrade FA, Bavia L, Guilherme L, Messias-Reason IJ. Ficolin-3 in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Immunol Lett. 2021;229:27–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ding H, Wu T. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in autoimmune diseases. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:499.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mukherjee S, Jagadeeshaprasad MG, Banerjee T, Ghosh SK, Biswas M, Dutta S, Kulkarni MJ, Pattari S, Bandyopadhyay A. Proteomic analysis of human plasma in chronic rheumatic mitral stenosis reveals proteins involved in the complement and coagulation cascade. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gao G, Xuan C, Yang Q, Liu X-C, Liu Z-G, He G-W. Identification of altered plasma proteins by proteomic study in valvular heart diseases and the potential clinical significance. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8): e72111.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu X, Yue Q, Jia W, Zhang J, Ouyang H, Xin D, Xiao Y. A novel approach for characterizing variations in serum peptides in rheumatic heart disease. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(3):365.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lumngwena EN, Skatulla S, Blackburn JM, Ntusi NA. Mechanistic implications of altered protein expression in rheumatic heart disease. Heart Fail Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-09993-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi HM, Doss HM, Kim KS. Multifaceted physiological roles of adiponectin in inflammation and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1219.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Würzner R, Joysey VC, Lachmann PJ. Complement component C7. Assessment of in vivo synthesis after liver transplantation reveals that hepatocytes do not synthesize the majority of human C7. J Immunol. 1994;152(9):4624–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sircar M, Rosales IA, Selig MK, Xu D, Zsengeller ZK, Stillman IE, Libermann TA, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani RI. Complement 7 is up-regulated in human early diabetic kidney disease. Am J Pathol. 2018;188(10):2147–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mebazaa A, Vanpoucke G, Thomas G, Verleysen K, Cohen-Solal A, Vanderheyden M, Bartunek J, Mueller C, Launay J-M, Van Landuyt N. Unbiased plasma proteomics for novel diagnostic biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: identification of quiescin Q6 as a candidate biomarker of acutely decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(18):2317–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vanhaverbeke M, Vausort M, Veltman D, Zhang L, Wu M, Laenen G, Gillijns H, Moreau Y, Bartunek J, Van De Werf F. Peripheral Blood RNA Levels of QSOX1 and PLBD1 are new independent predictors of left ventricular Dysfunction After acute myocardial infarction. Circu Genom Precis Med. 2019;12(12): e002656.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H-Y, Chu M-L, Pan T-C, Sasaki T, Timpl R, Ekblom P. Extracellular matrix protein fibulin-2 is expressed in the embryonic endocardial cushion tissue and is a prominent component of valves in adult heart. Dev Biol. 1995;167(1):18–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miosge N, Sasaki T, Chu M-L, Herken R, Timpl R. Ultrastructural localization of microfibrillar fibulin-1 and fibulin-2 during heart development indicates a switch in molecular associations. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1998;54(6):606–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kruger R, Rasmussen LM, Argraves WS, Eugen-Olsen J, Nielsen OW, Blyme A, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K, Olsen MH. Extracellular matrix biomarker, fibulin-1, is closely related to NT-proBNP and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in patients with aortic valve stenosis (the SEAS study). PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7): e101522.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Dahl JS, Møller JE, Videbæk L, Poulsen MK, Rudbæk TR, Pellikka PA, Scott Argraves W, Rasmussen LM. Plasma fibulin-1 is linked to restrictive filling of the left ventricle and to mortality in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(6): e003889.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Al Maskari R, McEniery CM, Cleary SE, Li Y, Siew K, Figg NL, Khir AW, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB, O’Shaughnessy KM. The matrix proteins aggrecan and fibulin-1 play a key role in determining aortic stiffness. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Beltrame MH, Catarino SJ, Goeldner I, Boldt ABW, de Messias-Reason IJ. The lectin pathway of complement and rheumatic heart disease. Front Pediatr. 2015;2:148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gomaa MH, Khidr EG, Elshafei A, Hamza HS, Fattouh AM, El-Husseiny AA, Aglan A, Eldeib MG. The clinical value of ficolin-3 gene polymorphism in rheumatic heart disease. An Egyptian adolescents study. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Narula J, Chopra P, Reddy KS. Endomyocardial biopsies in acute rheumatic fever. Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Pediatric Cardiology, Bangkok, Thailand, November 1989. Abstract no F226. 1989.

  49. Golbasi Z, Ucar O, Keles T, Sahin A, Cagli K, Camsari A, Diker E, Aydogdu S. Increased levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease: evidence of ongoing inflammation. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(5):593–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Karthikeyan G, Fung E, Foo RS. Alternative hypothesis to explain disease progression in rheumatic heart disease. Circulation. 2020;142(22):2091–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rifaie O, Badr M, Salam AA, Galal H. Colchicine ameliorates the chronic inflammatory state in patients with chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease: a pilot study. Egypt Heart J. 2020;72(1):42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zühlke L, Engel ME, Karthikeyan G, Rangarajan S, Mackie P, Cupido B, Mauff K, Islam S, Joachim A, Daniels R. Characteristics, complications, and gaps in evidence-based interventions in rheumatic heart disease: the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (the REMEDY study). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(18):1115–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Song H, Chan J, Rovin BH. Induction of chemokine expression by adiponectin in vitro is isoform dependent. Transl Res. 2009;154(1):18–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. H3Africa. The RHDGen network: genetics of rheumatic heart disease and molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis. https://h3africa.org/index.php/consortium/the-rhdgennetwork-genetics-of-rheumatic-heart-disease-andmolecular-epidemiology-of-streptococcuspyogenes-pharyngitis/. Accessed 22 Apr 2021.

  55. Assembly sWM. Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1990;24:606–9.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai J, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu DJ, Inuganti A, Griss J, Mayer G, Eisenacher M. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D442–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants for being a part of this study, as well as the members of the Mayosi Research Group Coordinating Office team and collaborating sites’ staff for the study coordination, recruitment, data entry, and cleaning. We also thank the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) Network Consortium members listed in the Additional file 1. We acknowledge the Hatter Institute of Cardiovascular Research in Africa (HICRA), and its cardiovascular genetics laboratory for assisting with all of the preliminary wet laboratory work. Finally, we would like to thank everyone who took the time to provide valuable input throughout this study.

RHDGen Network Consortium: In memory of Bongani M f, MD DPhil.

Funding

This work was supported by grants awarded to Bongani M. Mayosi (deceased) from the Wellcome Trust under the H3Africa; Grant number: 099313/B/12/A. TS and ME received support from the South African National Research Foundation (NRF) #116287 and the American Heart Association, United States (Grant number: NW17SFRN33630027). BK acknowledges funding from the British Heart Foundation (CH/13/2/30154, and RG/15/12/31616), UKRI ESRC via the Newton Fund (ES/N01393X/1) and UKRI Medical Research Council (MR/P025463), via the Global Challenge Research Fund.

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Taariq Salie and Jing Yang contributed equally to this work

  2. Bernard Keavney and Mark E. Engel share equal senior authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AFROStrep Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    M. Taariq Salie & Mark E. Engel

  2. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Jing Yang, Simon Frain & Bernard Keavney

  3. Manchester Heart Institute, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    Bernard Keavney

  4. Stoller Biomarker Discovery Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Rachael Da Silva & Dave Chi Hoo Lee

  5. Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Liesl J. Zühlke & Christopher Hugo-Hamman

  6. Division of Cardiology, University of Cape Town & Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

    Chishala Chishala & Mpiko Ntsekhe

  7. Cardiology Department of Medicine, Kenyatta National Hospital, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Bernard Gitura

  8. Departments of Adult and Pediatric Cardiology, Uganda Heart Institute, Kampala, Uganda

    Emmy Okello & Peter Lwabi

  9. University Teaching Hospital–Children’s Hospital, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

    John Musuku & Agnes Mtaja

  10. Rheumatic Heart Disease Clinic, Windhoek Central Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia

    Christopher Hugo-Hamman

  11. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alshaab Teaching Hospital, Alazhari Health Research Center, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan

    Ahmed El-Sayed

  12. Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University/Nucleo de Investigaçao, Departamento de Medicina, Hospital Central de Maputo, Maputo, Mozambique

    Albertino Damasceno

  13. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique

    Ana Mocumbi

  14. Division of Non Communicable Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Saude, Vila de Marracuene, Mozambique

    Ana Mocumbi

  15. Departments of Paediatrics, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

    Fidelia Bode-Thomas, Christopher Yilgwan & Esin Nkereuwem

  16. Department of Medicine and Cape Heart Institute (CHI), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Gasnat Shaboodien

  17. Division of Informatics, Imaging, and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester , UK

    Carlos R. Ramírez Medina

  18. Department of Surgery, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Stephen Ogendo

  19. Department of Medicine, University of Jos and Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria

    Ganiyu A. Amusa

  20. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

    Nophar Geifman

  21. Faculty of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

    Anthony D. Whetton

Authors
  1. M. Taariq Salie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos R. Ramírez Medina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liesl J. Zühlke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chishala Chishala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mpiko Ntsekhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernard Gitura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stephen Ogendo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Emmy Okello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter Lwabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. John Musuku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Agnes Mtaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Christopher Hugo-Hamman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ahmed El-Sayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Albertino Damasceno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ana Mocumbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Fidelia Bode-Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Christopher Yilgwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Ganiyu A. Amusa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Esin Nkereuwem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Gasnat Shaboodien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Rachael Da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Dave Chi Hoo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Simon Frain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Nophar Geifman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Anthony D. Whetton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Bernard Keavney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Mark E. Engel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the RHDGen Network Consortium

Contributions

Conceptualization: NG, ANW, BK and MEE. Acquisition of data: All authors contributed to the acquisition of data. Data curation/formal analysis: MTS, JY, CRRM, LJZ, DCHL, SF, NG, BK and MEE. Drafting/critical editing: MTS, JY, CRRM, BK and MEE. Reviewing manuscript: All authors contributed to reviewing the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Engel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) Network is a project within Human Hereditary and Health Africa (H3Africa) [54]. The University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee approved the present study as a sub study of RHDGen. Written informed consent was given for all cases and controls included into the study. The present study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki [55].

Consent for publication

All consents obtained prior to publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Scatter plots of BMI and age in cases and controls with their density plots in each group. Figure S2. Percentage of missing data in proteins with dashed red line representing the cutoff line. Figure S3. Pearson correlation coefficients of protein expression with BMI/Age among case and control samples. Correlation coefficients are in general weak, and not systematically different between cases and controls. Figure S4. Errorbar plots of protein expressions in females (x-axis) and males (y-axis) in case and control samples, respectively. The dashed lines are identity lines. Table S1. The eight African countries contributing participants in the study. Table S2. Mean of log2-scaled protein expression quantities in cases and controls, log2 foldchange between cases and controls, p-values from student t-test and adjusted p-values for multiple comparisons (only proteins with adjusted p value<0.05 are shown here). Table S3. Comparisons of protein signatures identified by Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression. Table S4. Pathways from ClueGO analysis of input proteins identified by Bortua algorithm by using plasma library reference (n = 2559). Table S5. Pathways from ClueGO analysis of input proteins identified by Bortua algorithm by using whole human genome reference. List of RHDGen Network Consortium Members

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salie, M.T., Yang, J., Ramírez Medina, C.R. et al. Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry in severe rheumatic heart disease (RHD) identifies a proteomic signature showing ongoing inflammation and effectively classifying RHD cases. Clin Proteom 19, 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09345-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09345-1

Keywords

Clinical Proteomics

ISSN: 1559-0275