Open Access

Proteomic profile of pre - B2 lymphoblasts from children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in relation with the translocation (12; 21)

  • Odile Costa1Email author,
  • Pascale Schneider1, 2Email author,
  • Laurent Coquet3, 4,
  • Philippe Chan3,
  • Dominique Penther5,
  • Elisabeth Legrand1,
  • Thierry Jouenne3, 4,
  • Marc Vasse1 and
  • Jean-Pierre Vannier1, 2
Clinical Proteomics201411:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-11-31

Received: 21 January 2014

Accepted: 14 July 2014

Published: 1 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Until now, the major prognostic factors for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), age, white blood cell count and chromosomal alterations are initially taken into account for the risk stratification of patients. In the light of protein marker studies to classify subtypes of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia efficiently, we have compared the lymphoblastes proteome in Childhood ALL in accordance with the presence of t(12;21), indicator of good prognosis, usually.

Methods

Protein expression in pre-B2 lymphoblastic cells, collected from residual bone marrow cells after diagnostic procedures, was analyzed using two dimensional gel electrophoresis protocol. Protein spots whose average normalized volumes were statistically different in the two patients groups (n = 13; student t test p < 0.01), were excised. Tryptic peptides were then analyzed using a nano-LC1200 system coupled to a 6340 Ion Trap mass spectrometer equipped with a HPLC-chip cube interface. The tandem mass spectrometry peak lists extracted using the DataAnalysis program, were compared with the protein database Mascot Daemon.

Results

We focused on twelve spots corresponding to sixteen identified candidate proteins among the 26 found differentially expressed (p ≤ 0.05) regarding the presence of t(12;21). Among over expressed proteins, two proteins were implicated in cellular growth arrest (i.e. calponine 2, p ≤ 0.001 and phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta, p ≤ 0.001) in accordance with good prognosis, while two other proteins favored cell cycle proliferation (i.e. methionine adenosyl transferase 2β, p ≤ 0.005 and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleo-proteins A2 p ≤ 0.01) and could therefore be good marker candidates of aggressiveness. Level of expression of proteasome subunit beta type-2 (p ≤ 0.01) and protein casein kinase 2α (p ≤ 0.01) which both favored apoptosis, deubiquitinating enzyme OTUB1 (p ≤ 0.05) and MLL septin-like fusion protein MSF-B, septin 9 i4 (p ≤ 0.01) were in accord with a good prognosis related to t(12;21) lymphoblasts.

Conclusion

By drawing up the protein map of leukemic cells, these new data identified marker candidates of leukemic aggressiveness and new t(12;21) patients subgroups. These preliminary results will be in the near future confirmed by using a larger sample of pre-B2 childhood ALLs from national lymphoblastic cell collections.

Keywords

Childhood ALL Biomarkers Calponin OTUB1 Protein casein kinase CK2α and Ikaros

Background

The most common form of childhood cancer is the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), representing up to 30% of childhood cancers. The major prognostic factors, age and white blood cell count, are initially taken into account for the risk stratification of patients. Recurrent chromosomal alterations detectable by karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or molecular techniques are found in 75% of childhood ALL and have important implications on prognosis [1]. The chromosomal rearrangement t(12;21) ETV6-RUNX1 is associated with favorable outcome in B-ALL and much more frequent in childhood ALL (25% of B lineage ALL) [2]. The identification of genomic alterations is currently transforming our understanding of the genetic basis of leukemogenesis. Among these new genetic factors, alterations of the lymphoid transcription factor IKAROS (IKZF1) in B-ALL are remarkably associated with a poor outcome [3]. Though it is not the only example, only few other genetic alterations can be clearly associated with outcome in childhood ALL. This new insight on genomic profile of childhood ALL still has to be further explored. In the light of studies in which identified proteins, differentially expressed, could serve as markers to classify M1 and M2 subtypes of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia, a correlation was also found between the accumulation of some proteins and therapeutic outcome and relapse time of the disease [4, 5].

The present work relies on the global analysis of the protein expression of lymphoblastic cells and the identification of proteins as new biological markers, related to cytogenetic abnormalities. Therefore, we compared the whole proteome of bone marrow lymphoblasts collected by bone marrow aspiration during the diagnosis procedure. The proteome of each bone marrow lymphoblasts sample from pre-B2 t(12;21) ALLs, has been mapped using two dimensional poly acrylamide gel electrophoresis (2 DE) and compared to those from pre B2 ALLs without that translocation.

We identified twelve spots (corresponding to sixteen candidate proteins) whose average level was highly correlated either with the presence or the absence of t(12;21) EV6-RUNX1 detected by cytogenetic analysis. Among the identified proteins two of them, protein kinase 2α (CK2α) and septin 9 i4 (v4) (SEPT9), are related to genes already identified and described in leukemogenesis, i.e. IKAROS and MLL, respectively [3]. CK2α is implicated in the phosphorylation of several proteins like phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and Ikaros acting on leukemia cell survival [6, 7]. SEPT9 is implicated in cytokinesis and its role in tumorigenesis has been shown in various human tumors [8]. Beside these two proteins of interest we found other significantly differential amount of proteins related in some way to cell survival and already pointed out in several solid tumors. They could be related to several genes or pathways in relation with the regulation of the cell cycle, the apoptosis and also to the energetic metabolism of these very proliferative leukemic cells. Discussion debates about which protein might be a marker of good versus bad prognosis and which protein could be explored as a treatment target to defeat leukemogenesis.

Results

Patients

Among the thirteen patients (Table 1) with newly diagnosed B-ALL (pre-B2) which were included in this study, six children had an identified t(12;21) with an ETV6-RUNX1 fusion transcript. The global outcome was good for both groups, 5/6 in the translocation group being alive in first complete remission (CR1) with a median follow-up, of 82 months (range 72–129), 6/7 were in CR1 in the group without t(12;21) (median follow-up 102.5 months; range 75–141). For both dead patients, death was directly related to the recurrence of ALL.
Table 1

Clinical and biological status of childhood pre-B2 ALL patients

Group of ALL patients

Patients ID

Age at diagnosis (Months)

Peripheral blood lymphocytes (Giga/L)

Karyotype

Fusion transcripts

Outcome

With t(12; 21)

BACYO

24

48,7

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

CR1

GUEKE

118

42,2

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

CR1

LECRO

76

5,4

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

CR1

MARLE

42

166

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

CR1

PELAD

50

20

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

Dead*

RIFEM

76

216

t(12; 21)

ETV6/RUNX1

CR1

Other karyotype abnormalities

BOILE

18

2,8

dic(9;20)

NA

CR1

CREBA

180

11,6

mono 21

NA

CR1

DESNA

13

15,5

rear9p

NA

CR1

JUGEL

34

8,5

Hyperploidy

NA

CR1

LEMAL

48

56

t(9; 22)

BCL/ABL1

CR1

MORLU

171

171

t(9; 22)

BCL/ABL1

Dead*

ROSLO

57

6,1

Hyperploidy

NA

CR1

The bold numbers indicates values higher the threshold of FRALLE 2000 protocol. CR1 = First complete remission; dic = dicentric; ID = Identification; mono = monosomy; NA = Not applicable; rear = Rearrangement. * = Directly related to the recurrence of ALL.

Protein identifications

A total of 4000 spots were detected on 2-DE maps (Figure 1). Protein maps were gathered with regard to the presence (n = 6) or the absence (n = 7) of t(12;21) (Table 1). Twenty six spots were found differently expressed in the two groups of patients (Table 2 for the top 12 spots; the whole spot informations can be seen in Online Additional file 1: Table S1) (student-t test, p ≤ 0.05). Repeatability assay was performed as indicated in Patients, material and methods, giving reliable results (see Online Additional file 1: Figure S1). Most of these proteins are involved in the cell cycle regulation (25%), metabolism (32%) and apoptosis (14%) (Figure 2A). The last ones (18%) are implicated in cytoskeleton organization, protein elongation or posttranslational events while 11% are not yet identified. However, among the 26 differentially expressed spots, only eleven spots (Figure 1A, see also Online Additional file 1: Figure S2 which located the last 15 spots), representing fifteen candidate proteins, were expressed with a sufficient reliable statistic power (student-t test, p ≤ 0.01, with a Power higher than 80%) in the two groups of patients (Figure 3). The average normalized volumes values and statistic ranks are listed Table 2. Five of them were expressed mostly in t(12;21) ALLs. The last seven spots were expressed mostly in the absence of this translocation. Corresponding proteins (Table 2, and Online Additional file 1: Table S1), identified by Mass Spectrometry with relevant Mascot score (more than 3 ions scores > 48) (see Online Additional file 1: Figure S3) were of great interest in terms of leukemogenesis since involved in mechanisms related to either the cell cycle regulation, or apoptosis, or energetic metabolism (i.e., 43%, 29% or 28% of them, respectively) (Figure 2B). Principal components analysis (PCA) (see Patients, materials and methods) indicated that the amount of all the 26 spots of interest, when gathered together, could discriminate 2 groups of patient, correlating with the presence or absence of t(12;21) (Figure 4A,B).
Figure 1

Differential expression of proteins in bone marrow lymphoblastic cells from childhood pre-B ALL. – A – Down: Two-DE gel image of lymphoblastic cells proteins issuing from bone marrow. Numbers refer to the top eleven proteins which have been characterized and listed in Table 1b. Up: Magnification view of interesting zone – B – 3 D montage of the three top differentially expressed spot proteins (i.e., 2-DE Batch 2768, 3185 and 4083 on rank 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Only 2 individual spot images in each group (1 and 2 = Pre-B2 ALL with t(12;21), 1′ and 2′ = Pre-B2 ALL with other karyotype abnormalities) are shown.

Table 2

The classification of differentially expressed proteins in pre-B2 lymphoblastic cells from children with ALL

Spots: statistic rank (2-DE batch)

Protein names [Homo sapiens]

NCBI and uniprot ID numbers

Fold changes/ALL t(12;21) versus others (average normalized volume +/- SD) 105

Group with the upper average volume

Student -t test

Power (after q value)

1 (2768)

CNN2

gi/49456619/ Q99439

1.9/(38.59 +/- 8.1 vs 20.76 +/- 4)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.001

0.998

2 (3185)

CDSα

gi/32307132/ Q9Y697-1

2.2/(9.5 +/- 3.8 vs 20.98 +/- 5.2)

Other Pre - B2

p ≤ 0.001

0.985

3 (4083)

PITPβ

gi/6912594/ P48739

2/( 12.8 +/- 3.1 vs 6.28 +/- 2.21)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.001

0.983

4 (2457)

hnRNP-E1

gi/460771/ Q15365

1.4/(29.87 +/- 4.69 vs 41.57 +/- 4.88)

Other Pre -B2

p ≤ 0.005

0.976

BUB3α

gi/4757880/ O43684

5 (4069)

PDH-E1

gi/149242791/ P13804 -1

1.5/(15.16 +/- 4.33 vs 23.29 +/- 3.12)

Other Pre -B2

p ≤ 0.005

0.955

6 (2090)

MAT2β i1

gi/11034825/ Q9NZL9

1.5/(21.94 +/- 3.89 vs 15.06 +/- 2.91)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.005

0.915

7 (2800)

PSMB2

gi/4506195/ B7Z478

1.7/(9.48 +/- 2.49 vs 5.69 +/- 1.63)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.01

0.878

8 (4081)

CECR5

gi/14861834/ Q9BXW7

1.3/(28.51 +/- 4.48 vs 37.3 +/- 4.81)

Other Pre - B2

p ≤ 0.01

0.867

BUB3α

gi/4757880/ O43684

9 (3121)

CK2α

gi/4503095/ P68400

1.5/(13.55 +/- 2.36 vs 20.31 +/- 4.9)

Other Pre - B2

p ≤ 0.01

0.864

SEPT9 i3

gi/668381/ Q9UHD8-3

10 (2056)

HnRNPA2

gi/4504447/ P22626-2

2/(18.28 +/- 6.56 vs 9.26 +/- 4.77)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.01

0.854

11 (3120)

IVAD

gi/3212539/ P26440

1.5/( 14.98 +/- 3.44 vs 22.64 +/- 5.34)

Other Pre B2

p ≤ 0.01

0.835

FBA

gi/312137/ P05062

PSMB6

gi/1526426/ P62333

12 (2656)

OTUB1

gi/6841176/ Q96FW1

1.8/(58.54 +/- 19.8 vs (32.01 +/- 14.53)

Pre - B2, t(12;21)

p ≤ 0.05

0.787

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) Batches are located Figure 1A (in case of the top eleven) and Additional file 1: Figure S2 (for the following 15th). In column’ protein names, R1, R2 and R3 are the Mascot rank based on the whole ionic scores detected (upper or equal to 48). Power analysis is performed independently for each spot, taking into consideration the sample size and variance expression value (Progenesis SameSpots V4). CNN2 = calponin-2; CDSα = cysteine desulfurase, mitochondrial isoform a; PITPβ = phosphatidyl- inositol transfer protein beta isoform; BUB3a = mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3 isoform a; PDH E1 = chain A, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 S264e Variant; MAT2β = methionine adenosyl transferase 2, subunit beta, isoform 1; PSMB2 = proteasome subunit beta type-2, isoform 1; CECR5 = cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 isoform 2; CK2α = casein kinase II subunit alpha isoform a; SEPT9_i3 = MLL septin-like fusion protein MSF-B; hnRNPA2 = heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleo- proteins A2; IVAD = Chain A, isovaleryl-Coa dehydrogenase; FBA = fructose bisphosphate aldolase; PSMB6 = proteasome subunit 6 (p42); OTUB1 = deubiquitinating enzyme OTUB1.

Figure 2

Pie chart representing the principal protein’s functions with differential expression in lymphoblasts from pre-B2 ALL children, depending on the presence or absence of the translocation t(12; 21). Proteins are characterized by LC-MSMS and Mascot score from 2-DE spots with: A- Differential expression with p ≤ 0.05 (n = 28); B- Differential expression with p ≤ 0.01 (n = 15). ND = none defined.

Figure 3

Histogram of the average normalized volumes of the top eleven spots of protein with differential expression in lymphoblasts from pre-B2 ALL children, depending on the presence or absence of the translocation t(12;21).  = Pre-B2 ALLs with t(12;21), n = 6; □ = Pre-B2 ALLs with other karyotype abnormalities, n = 7. p ≤ 0.001***; p ≤ 0.005**; p ≤ 0.01*. Numbers are protein arranged by statistical rank, listed in Table 2.

Figure 4

Principal components analysis of spots with differential expression (student t test, t < 0.01), in lymphoblasts from pre-B2 ALL children, depending on the presence or absence of the translocation t(12; 21). Results were obtained with Progenesis SameSpotsV4. Left dotes () are t(12;21) pre B2 ALLs patients (n = 6); Right dotes (▲) are other karyotype abnormalities in pre B2 ALLs patients (n = 7) (see comments below). A/ Spots differentially expressed with student t test value: p > 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05 (n = 15); B/ Spots differentially expressed with p ≤ 0.01(n = 11). Names close to dotes are identification badge of patients listed in Table 1.

Among the proteins involved in cell cycle regulation, are the calponin-2 (CNN2) and methionine adenosyltransferase 2beta (MAT2β) variant 1, which are highly expressed in ALL with t(12;21), usually associated to good prognosis (p < 0.001, with a power of 0.998; p < 0.005, with a power of 0.985, respectively) (see Table 2). On the contrary hnRNP-E1, mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3α (or BUB3α) or MLL septin-like fusion protein MSF-B (SEPT9_i4) were weakly expressed in ALL with t(12;21), (p < 0.005).

Among proteins involved in apoptosis, phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins beta (PITPβ) was highly expressed in ALL with t(12;21), while the casein kinase 2 alpha (CK2α) protein was weakly expressed in this group of patients (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Proteasome subunit beta 2 (PSMB2), one of the two proteins of the PSM which we found, was predominant in ALL with t(12;21) (p < 0.01) while PSM beta 6 (or P42 i.e., PSMB6) predominated in the other group of pre-B2 ALL (p < 0.01). Interestingly, HSPC263 (i.e., OTUB1), a deubiquitinating enzyme was slightly over expressed in t(12;21) ALLs, in the rank just after the first group of eleven spots described (Table 2).

The other proteins which were implicated in cellular metabolic pathways (i.e., cystein desulfurase alpha (CDSα), pyruvate deshydrogenase E1 (PDH-E1), cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 (CECR5), isovaleryl CoA deshydrogenase (IVAD) and fructose biphosphate aldolase (FBA)) were all together predominant in the group of pre-B2 ALL without t(12;21) (p < 0.005, p < 0.005, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). CECR5 has not yet been described in lymphoblasts.

Discussion

Little is known about proteomic profiling in childhood ALL. Recently, protein expression was compared in leukemia cell lines and in patients before (i.e., at the diagnostic day) and after 7 days (D8) of prednisolone treatment [9]. The results focused on two proteins differentially expressed: the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, which plays important roles during DNA replication and repair and the voltage-dependent anion channel which participates in the formation of the permeability transition pore complex, are responsible for the release of mitochondrial products that trigger apoptosis [10]. All these data confirmed the interest of proteomics in hematology malignancy.

The aim of the present work was to identify proteins that could be related to a good prognosis, often associated to the translocation t(12;21) in childhood ALL. Thus, we pointed out differences in amounts of some proteins expressed in t(12;21) ALLs and non t(12;21) ALLs. These proteins have been classified regarding their biological activity. We discussed the relevance of these proteins as diagnostic markers and/or targets for leukemia therapy.

Proteins involved in cell cycle regulation

Some proteins of this group are involved in the cell cycle regulation (e.g. CNN2 the neutral isoform which belongs to a family of actin filament-associated proteins). CNN2 has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, suggesting its regulatory role in cytokinetic activities [11]. CNN2 is also known to activate PKC phosphorylation, a key mechanism that mediates growth arrest in tumor cell lines [12]. Its increased or reduced expression has been associated in solid tumors with good or poor prognosis, respectively [13]. So, the over expression of CNN2 here observed in t(12;21) ALLs, could reduce the cell proliferation and could be related to the good prognosis usually associated to this translocation (Table 3).
Table 3

Concluding remarks and future directions

Expression observed in t(12;21) ALLs

Major expected cellular effects

Comments

Future directions

Over expression of CNN2

Mediates cellular growth arrest

In favor of good prognosis associated to t(12;21)

Is CNN2 a marker of good prognosis? It has to be confirmed with a largest group of patients

Over expression of MAT-2β

Favors the cell proliferation with anti-apoptotic effect

Would be a marker of cancer aggressiveness

Would be explore as a target of chemotherapy

Over expression of hnRNPA2

Favors the cell proliferation

Would be a marker of cancer aggressiveness

Would be explore as a target of chemotherapy

Over expression of PITPβ

Slow down the cell proliferation

Is it a marker of good prognosis?

Exploration of the balance PITPα/β

Under expression of BUB3

Avoid slippage of mitosis

Over expression in non t(12;21) could lead to hypo/hyperpolyploid cells

Mitoses analysis

Under expression of hnRNPE2

Favors apoptosis

In favor of good prognosis associated to t(12;21)

Exploration of the balance between hnRNPE2, PSMB2 and PSMB6 and/or checkup the apoptosis pathways

Over expression of PSMB2

Favors apoptosis

Under expression of PSMB6

Hinders apoptosis

In favor of leukogenesis

Under expression of CK2α

Slow down the proliferation by apoptotic effect

In favor of good prognosis associated to t(12;21)

Both expressions in combination with Ikaros (Ikzf1) phosphorylation and degradation ought to be clarified precisely

Over expression of HSPC263(OTUB1)

Favors deubiquitination

Does it prevent Ikaros (Ikzf1) degradation?

Under expression of metabolism pathway proteins (i.e., CDSα; CECR5; PDH; IVAD; IDH; Electron transfer flavoprotein)

Sign the level of energetic consumption

In favor of good prognosis associated to t(12;21)

Checkup lymphoblasts metabolism pathway: High amount would be in accord with cancer aggressiveness

The MAT2β subunit is the second protein of this group. It was found over expressed in t(12;21) ALLs. MAT2 is implicated in the methylation protein pathway (i.e. trans-methylation, trans-sulfuration, and polyamine synthesis) and acts as a transcriptional co-repressor of the oncogene MafK [14, 15]. Accordingly, MAT2 activity is constitutively expressed in stimulated and actively dividing T cells, as well as T leukemic cells [16]. The subunit MAT2β, which is catalytically inactive, is the regulatory subunit of the isozyme [15, 17]. When expression of MAT2β is successfully silenced, excessive apoptosis and growth slowdown is observed in Jurkat leukemic T cell [17, 18]. Recently MAT2β v1 (here characterized), has been identified as an anti-apoptotic component through Sirtuin 1 signaling [19]. Therefore, the over expression of MAT2β in t(12;21) ALLs cannot be considered as a good prognostic factor. It seems to have the opposite effect on cell proliferation when compared to CNN2. MAT-2β has to be evaluated as a possible target to improve prognosis in the t(12;21) ALLs (Table 3).

HnRNPA2 functions as telomeric capping factor protecting telomeric DNA in vivo against nuclease digestion by recruiting the essential RNA subunit (hTR) to the telomere [20]. RNAi, reduction of hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2 significantly reduced the proliferation rate of Colo 16 cells, suggesting that these hnRNP members may be classified as oncogenes [21]. HnRNPA2 is found overexpressed in t(12,21)ALLs and thus would contribute to favor the pre - B2 proliferation and would be a marker of leukemogenesis (Table 3).

The three last proteins included in this group (i.e. hnRNP-E1, BUB3α and SEPT9_i4) are under expressed in t(12;21) ALLs.

HnRNPE1 is a member of the RNA binding protein family which includes important mitotic regulators and effectors, having multiple functions in hematopoietic cells. It is involved in controlling stem cell proliferation and differentiation [21, 22]. Particularly, acting as “chaperone” molecule on the RNA, hnRNPs E1 functions as crucial modulator of mRNA stability, and translation in hematopoietic cell differentiation [23]. It stimulates the translation of c-myc and Bag-1, having an anti-apoptotic effect on cancer cells [21, 24]. The accumulation of hnRNPE1 in lymphoblastes could induce an anti-apoptotic effect, worsening the disease. The under expression of hnRNPE2 observed in t(12;21) ALLs would contribute to apoptosis in these leukemic cells (Table 3).

The BUB3α is one of the components of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) which interacts with BUB1 and leads to delay the cell cycle progression [25]. However, in conditions where the SAC is kept active, some cells escape from mitosis, resulting in polyploid cells [25]. Its over expression in non t(12;21) ALLs could contribute to the slippage of mitosis toward a hypo/polyploid cells (Table 3).

SEPT9_i4 is an isoform of the GTP binding septin family, involved in cytokinesis. Over expression of the short isoform SEPT9_i4 disturbs septin interactions and cellular motility which can be related to neoplasic associated phenotypes [26]. SEPT9_i4 over expressing cells have enhanced survival in the presence of clinically relevant microtubule acting drugs. Its over expression in several cancers may be clinically relevant with a contribution of drug resistance forms of cancer [27]. This i4 variant is the COOH terminal sequence of all the isoformes [28]. Thereby it may be difficult to reach it as a specific target. By introducing mutations that prevent SEPT9 self - association at the N- and C-termini, it has been shown that septin filament disruption causes defects in the late stages of cell division before abscission, similar to these observed upon SEPT9 depletion [28].

Proteins involved in apoptosis

Among proteins which are principally implicated in apoptotic pathways and may have a prognostic value (i.e., PITPβ, CK2α, and PSMB2, PSMB6), phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins beta (PITPβ) and CK2α have an impact on Pl3K pathway.

PITPβ was highly expressed in the group of t(12; 21) ALLs. Physiologically, PITPβ is poorly expressed and favors the activation of a golgian PI3K [29]. PITPβ accumulation, by modifying the balance PITPα/β, induces a decrease of proliferation and an increase of apoptosis [30]. The exploration of the balance PITPα/β in ALLs may be a useful biological marker.

On the contrary, CK2α was under expressed in t(12; 21) ALLs. CK2α disturbs the PI3K pathway by phosphorylating PTEN and AKT, thereby favoring cell proliferation by an anti-apoptotic effect [7, 31]. The over expression of CK2α has been shown to increase the degradation of Ikaros protein (i.e., a tumor suppressor in ALL) via the ubiquitin pathway [3, 32, 33]. Interestingly in the t(12, 21)ALLs, not only CK2α is under expressed but OTUB1, a deubiquitinating enzyme, is found slightly over expressed (see Table 2, rank 12) [34]. OTUB1 hydrolase can specifically remove ‘Lys-48”-linked conjugated ubiquitin from proteins and plays an important regulatory role at the level of protein turnover by preventing degradation. It has recently been identified as a novel p53 regulator [35]. All together this could result in an preservation of Ikaros functions and would contribute to the good prognostic claimed for t(12;21) ALLs.

The two other proteins implicated in apoptosis (i.e., PSMB2 and PSMB6) are constitutive of the proteasome. The proteasome is responsible for the degradation of intracellular proteins involved in cell cycle control and regulation of apoptosis, including the tumor suppressor protein p53 and specific cyclin dependent kinases [36]. At this time we cannot explain why PSMB2 is predominant in t(12;21) ALLs, while PSMB6 is weakly expressed. New therapies against tumor growth and development have an anti-ubiquitin-proteasome pathway effect [36].

Two pathways in which most of these proteins (i.e., involved in apoptosis and also BUB3) were pointed out with Protein Center Software (Thermo Scientific ProteinCenter Software). The first one (Raw p-value, p < 6.98 10-7 and false discovery date (FDR), p < 5.41 10-4) is the negative regulation of protein ubiquitination (i.e., BUB3, OTUB1, PSMB6 and PSMB2). The second one (Raw p-value: p < 1.8 10-5 and FDR: p < 1.5 10-3) is the negative regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transition (i.e., BUB3, CK2a, PSMB6 and PSMB2). Both of them involved the same proteins. However, OTUB1 and CK2α exhibit an opposite effect on ubiquitination, CK2 acting indirectly on cell cycle progression.

Proteins involved in metabolic pathway

Proteins of the third group implicated in metabolic pathway (i.e., CDSα, PDH-E1, IVAD and FBA) are predominant in pre B2 ALLs without t(12; 21). CDS, the second protein at the statistical average rank, is involved in cellular iron homeostasis and in the production of selenoproteins which have antioxidant functions and possibly cancer-protective effects [37]. IVAD and FBA are involved in glucose metabolism [38]. FBA participates to ATP synthesis in the glycolytic glycol pathway in cancer cells [39]. Interestingly, increased glycolytic rate in ALL is directly related to glucocorticoid resistance in primary leukemic cells of pediatric ALL patients [40]. The similarity of CECR5 to yeast phosphatidyl synthases suggests that it is an enzyme involved in fatty acid metabolism, possibly in the production/processing of membrane phospholipids [41]. Its implication in ALLs has to be explored (Table 3).

Conclusion and future directions

Through this protein profile of children with or without t(12;21), several proteins of interest emerge, defining a “protein-map” associated to some subgroups of patients with particular features. The correlation between the proteins expression and the t(12;21) or its fusion transcript ETV6-RUNX1 still has to be confirmed. Nevertheless, this new approach for identification and classification of patient subgroups could lead to interesting therapeutic target. At the fundamental level, the identification of the biological pathway regulated by RUNX1 is also of importance to define the role of these proteins in leukemogenesis. Indeed, this is well documented for the fusion transcripts but rare or inexistent at the level of proteins translation or modulation [42]. Altogether, this proteomic analysis focuses on major proteins (Table 3) playing important roles in leukemogenesis. At the present time, the difficulty is to conclude on the order of importance of the expression of each protein implication in the same way (i.e. cellular proliferation or apoptosis). All lymphoblasts studied are coming from ALLs and so are leukemic cells. Consequently, it is not conflicting to find CNN2 and PITPB over expressed, put on the brake of cell growth and while MAT-2β or HnRPA2 also over expressed in t(12, 21) ALLs speed up the cell cycle. Future work will be devoted to study a larger panel of patients, and to confirm the proteins CNN2, protein CK2α and OTUB1 as good candidates markers of prognosis and if the some other proteins could be targeted by chemotherapy. The monitoring of the amount of these proteins following the induction treatment could also indicate its signaling pathway efficiency [43]. At the same time, the metabolism pathway check-up would inform on the level of energetic consumption linked to cancer aggressiveness. Another interesting question concerns the impact of the expression of CK2α [6, 7] and, possibly, OTUB1, on degrading Ikaros. Different ways of CK2 inhibition by small-molecule inhibitors have already been suggested as therapeutic tools for several cancers [44]. CK2 acts on Pl3K pathway by phosphorylating PTEN thereby leading to leukemia cell survival. It would be interesting to test in vitro inhibitors of CK2 and to compare their effect to inhibitors targeting PI3K/PKB [45]. Modulators or activators of OTUB1 would be also useful tools to control the ubiquitination/deubiquitination of proteins which slow down leukemogenesis (i.e., Ikaros, particularly) [46].

Patients, material and methods

Patients

Thirteen children with newly diagnosed B-ALL are included in this study. Analyses were carried out on residual bone marrow cells (BMC) after diagnostic procedures, in agreement with the requirements of the ethical committee of the Rouen University Hospital and the French ethical laws [47]. All patients were included in the French protocol for childhood ALL (FRALLE 2000) [48]. Patients were classified in two different groups according to the presence or absence of a translocation t(12; 21).

Cytogenetic and molecular analysis

Chromosome and FISH analysis were performed on unstimulated bone marrow and/or peripheral blood cells cultures using EV6-RUNX1 Abbott dual color DNA probes. EV6-RUNX1 fusion gene transcript is studied by real time –polymerase chain reaction as described in Biomed -1 concerted action’s report [49].

Cell preparation

Leukaemia cells from BMC were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) density gradient centrifugation and stored at -80°C [50]. A Human pre-B-ALL line, Nalm 6, was grown as indicated by DSMZ. (DSMZ, Braunschweig).

Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) of proteins

Proteins were extracted from dounce homogeneized cell pellets double washed in RPMI 1640, according to the protocol of the 2-D Clean-Up kit (GE Healthcare). The isoelectric focusing was performed by using dried 18-cm Immobiline pH 3–11NL (IPG) Strip rehydrated with 20 mM DeStreack IPG buffer pH 3–11, (GE Healthcare). Fifty μg of protein samples (or 300 μg for preparative 2-DE protocol) were loaded in anodic cup and proteins were focused using Ettan IPGphor 3 (pI 3–11 program). After equilibration, strips were sealed on the top of poly-acrylamide gel cassette precasted with the automate 2D Optimizer (Nextgen) (i.e. Sigmoid curve 6% to 18% gradient of Acrylamide-bis Acrylamide (37.5:1). 2-DE was carried out (500 V, 40 mA, 4 Hrs) in Ettan Dalt six Large Vertical System as described previously [51].

Gel staining and image analysis

Analytical Gels were silver stained using PlusOne Staining kit, protein (GE Healthcare Lifescience) based on a simplified method. For preparative scale, the gels were stained by colloidal Coomassie blue G-250 (Sigma Chemical Co). After coloration, gels were scanned and quantified by computing scanning densitometry (ImagScanner III densitometer-GE Healthcare). A total of 4000 protein spots were discriminated on 2-DE (i.e., whose the volume was up than 300,000). All gel images were normalized to the total valid spot volume of each gel and included for statistical group matches as described below.

Global statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out with Progenesis SameSpotsV4 [52]. Before “Progenesis software” analysis, the first step of analysis was to check the repeatability of our analysis by comparing randomly spots average volume in three gels per patient (see Additional file 1: Figure S1A). We indeed observed that artifactual results could be obtained when superposition of too many gels (each of them exhibiting about 4000 spots) was performed in the same analysis. That is the reason why in the next step, one representative of the three gels per patients was selected for gel images alignment (see Additional file 1: Figure S1B). Then statistic analysis has been performed with “Progenesis software” and the results are represented Figure 3, pointing out the eleven spots of the main area (seen in Figure 1). In the last step, we returned on our analysis, pointed out these eleven spots of the main area and compared the three protein maps for each thirteen patients (see Additional file 1: Figure S1B).

Gel spots whose intensity change was greater than 30% (student t test; p < 0.01) and exhibiting a power higher than 0.8 were claimed statistically relevant (Progenesis SameSpots V4). Therefore, multivariable statistical analysis was performed on data matrix of 15/or 12 rows (i.e., spots proteins; Figure 4A and B, respectively) and 2 columns (patients with t(12;21) and other patients). Automatic correlation and hierarchical clustering of protein spot intensities and Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied, using Progenesis Samespots software, to analyse the similarity of protein patterns among gels and the expression profiles of protein spots fulfilling the above criteria. PCA of raw data (i.e., spot volume values, average over 13 patients) allowed to discriminate two Principal Components (PC1 and PC2) which together explained 67.9% or 74.65% of the variance (Figure 4A and B, respectively). The PC1 accounted for up to 67.9% of the variance and was related to the diagnostic, each being distributed along PC1.

Mass spectrometry identification

Spots of interest were excised and trypsin digestion was performed as previously described [51]. Peptide were then analyzed using a nano-LC1200 system coupled to a 6340 Ion Trap mass spectrometer equipped with a HPLC-chip cube interface (Agilent Technologies, Massy, France). The tandem mass spectrometry peak lists were extracted using the DataAnalysis program (version 3.4, Bruker Daltonic) and compared with the protein database using Mascot Daemon (version 2.1.3). The determination of at least three peptide sequences with a Mascot Ion Score over 48 allowed a satisfactory identification of the protein.

Abbreviations

2-DE: 

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

ALL: 

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

CNN2: 

h2-calponin

MAT2Bβ: 

Methionine adenosyltransferase 2β

hnRNP-E1: 

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-E1

BUB3α: 

Mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3 isoform a

MSF-B: 

SEPT9_i4, MLL septin-like fusion protein

PITPβ: 

Phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins beta

CK2α: 

Casein kinase 2alpha

PSMB6: 

Proteasome subunits beta 2, PSMB2, proteasome subunits beta 6 (p42)

CDSα: 

Cystein desulfurase mitochondrial isoform α

PDH: 

Pyruvate dehydrogenase

IVAD: 

Isovaleryl CoA dehydrogenase.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Françoise Thouret for her technical assistance in leukemia cells preparations. This work was supported by grants from: the Lions clubs from Normandie (France), the Fondation Martine MIDY (France) and the Association Laurette FUGAIN, convention ALF/N°10-07 (France).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire MERCI, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Rouen
(2)
Service d’Immuno-Hématologie Onco-pédiatrique du CHRU de Rouen, Hôpital Charles Nicolle
(3)
PISSARO Proteomic facility, (IRIB)
(4)
CNRS UMR 6270, Team « Biofilms, Résistance, Interactions Cellules-Surfaces »
(5)
Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, Centre Henri Becquerel

References

  1. Mullighan CG: The molecular genetic makeup of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012, 2012: 389-396. Review,PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Romana SP, Poirel H, Leconiat M, Flexor MA, Mauchauffé M, Jonveaux P, Macintyre EA, Berger R, Bernard OA: High frequency of t(12;21) in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1995, 86: 4263-4269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Li Z, Song C, Ouyang H, Lai L, Payne KJ, Dovat S: Cell cycle-specific function of Ikaros in human leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012, 59: 69-76.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kornblau SM, Tibes R, Qiu YH, Chen W, Kantarjian HM, Andreeff M, Coombes KR, Mills GB: Functional proteomic profiling of AML predicts response and survival. Blood. 2009, 113: 154-164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Luczak M, Kaźmierczak M, Handschuh L, Lewandowski K, Komarnicki M, Figlerowicz M: Comparative proteome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia with and without maturation. J Proteomics. 2012, 75: 5734-5748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Martins LR, Lúcio P, Silva MC, Gameiro P, Silva MG, Barata JT: On CK2 regulation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell viability. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011, 356: 51-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barata JT: The impact of PTEN regulation by CK2 on PI3K-dependent signaling and leukemia cell survival. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2011, 51: 37-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Scott M, Hyland PL, McGregor G, Hillan KJ, Russell SE, Hall PA: Multimodality expression profiling shows SEPT9 to be overexpressed in a wide range of human tumours. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 4688-4700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang N, Kham SK, Koh GS, Suang Lim JY, Ariffin H, Chew FT, Yeoh AE: Identification of prognostic protein biomarkers in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). J Proteomics. 2011, 74: 843-857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gazy I, Kupiec M: The importance of being modified: PCNA modification and DNA damage response. Cell Cycle. 2012, 11: 2620-2623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hossain MM, Hwang DY, Huang QQ, Sasaki Y, Jin JP: Developmentally regulated expression of calponin isoforms and the effect of h2-calponin on cell proliferation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003, 284: C156-C167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu KC, Jin JP: Calponin in non-muscle cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2008, 52: 139-148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yamamura H, Yoshikawa H, Tatsuta M, Akedo H, Takahashi K: Expression of the smooth muscle calponin gene in human osteosarcoma and its possible association with prognosis. Int J Cancer. 1998, 79: 245-250.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Katoh Y, Ikura T, Hoshikawa Y, Tashiro S, Ito T, Ohta M, Kera Y, Noda T, Igarashi K: Methionine adenosyltransferase II serves as a transcriptional corepressor of Maf oncoprotein. Mol Cell. 2011, 41: 554-566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nordgren KK, Peng Y, Pelleymounter LL, Moon I, Abo R, Feng Q, Eckloff B, Yee VC, Wieben E, Weinshilboum RM: Methionine adenosyltransferase 2A/2B and methylation: gene sequence variation and functional genomics. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011, 39: 2135-2147.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang Q, Liu QY, Liu ZS, Qian Q, Sun Q, Pan DY: Inhibition of hepatocelluar carcinoma MAT2A and MAT2beta gene expressions by single and dual small interfering RNA. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 27: 72-80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jani TS, Gobejishvili L, Hote PT, Barve AS, Joshi-Barve S, Kharebava G, Suttles J, Chen T, McClain CJ, Barve S: Inhibition of methionine adenosyltransferase II induces FasL expression, Fas-DISC formation and caspase-8-dependent apoptotic death in T leukemic cells. Cell Res. 2009, 19: 358-369.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Attia RR, Gardner LA, Mahrous E, Taxman DJ, Legros L, Rowe S, Ting JP, Geller A, Kotb M: Selective targeting of leukemic cell growth in vivo and in vitro using a gene silencing approach to diminish S-adenosylmethionine synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 30788-30795.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang H, Zheng Y, Li TW, Peng H, Fernandez Ramos D, Martínez-Chantar ML, Rojas AL, Mato JM, Lu SC: Methionine adenosyltransferase 2B, HuR and sirtuin 1 crosstalk impacts on Resveratrol’s effect on apoptosis and growth in liver cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2013, 288: 23161-23170.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moran-Jones K, Wayman L, Kennedy DD, Reddel RR, Sara S, Snee MJ, Smith R: HnRNP A2 a potential ssDNA/RNA molecular adapter at the telomere. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 486-496.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carpenter B, MacKay C, Alnabulsi A, MacKay M, Telfer C, Melvin WT, Murray GI: The roles of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins in tumour development and progression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1765: 85-100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chaudhury A, Chander P, Howe PH: Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) in cellular processes: Focus on hnRNP E1’s multifunctional regulatory roles. RNA. 2010, 16: 1449-1462. Review,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostareck-Lederer A, Ostareck DH: Precision mechanics with multifunctional tools: how hnRNP K and hnRNPs E1/E2 contribute to post-transcriptional control of gene expression in hematopoiesis. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2012, 13: 391-400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang H, Ye Y, Pan SY, Zhu GY, Li YW, Fong DW, Yu ZL: Proteomic identification of proteins involved in the anticancer activities of oridonin in HepG2 cells. Phytomedicine. 2011, 18: 163-169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Niikura Y, Ogi H, Kikuchi K, Kitagawa K: BUB3 that dissociates from BUB1 activates caspase-independent mitotic death (CIMD). Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17: 1011-1024.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Robertson C, Church SW, Nagar HA, Price J, Hall PA, Russell SE: Properties of SEPT9 isoforms and the requirement for GTP binding. J Pathol. 2004, 203: 519-527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chacko AD, McDade SS, Chanduloy S, Church SW, Kennedy R, Price J, Hall PA, Russell SE: Expression of the SEPT9_i4 isoform confers resistance to microtubule-interacting drugs. Cell Oncol. 2012, 35: 85-93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim MS, Froese CD, Estey MP, Trimble WS: SEPT9 occupies the terminal positions in septin octamers and mediates polymerization-dependent functions in abscission. J Cell Biol. 2011, 195: 815-826.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Carvou N, Holic R, Li M, Futter C, Skippen A, Cockcroft S: Phosphatidylinositol -and phosphatidylcholine-transfer activity of PITPbeta is essential for COPI-mediated retrograde transport from the Golgi to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci. 2010, 123: 1262-1273.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Snoek GT: Phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins: emerging roles in cell proliferation, cell death and survival. IUBMB Life. 2004, 56: 467-475. Review,View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Riman S, Rizkallah R, Kassardjian A, Alexander KE, Lüscher B, Hurt MM: Phosphorylation of the transcription factor YY1 by CK2α prevents cleavage by caspase 7 during apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2012, 32: 797-807.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Payne KJ, Dovat S: Ikaros and tumor suppression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Crit Rev Oncog. 2011, 16: 3-12. Review,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dovat S, Song C, Payne KJ, Li Z: Ikaros, CK2 kinase, and the road to leukemia. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011, 356: 201-207. Review,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiener R, Zhang X, Wang T, Wolberger C: The mechanism of OTUB1-mediated inhibition of ubiquitination. Nature. 2012, 483: 618-622.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun XX, Challagundla KB, Dai MS: Positive regulation of p53 stability and activity by the deubiquitinating enzyme Otubain 1. EMBO J. 2012, 31: 576-592.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ludwig H, Khayat D, Giaccone G, Facon T: Proteasome inhibition and its clinical prospects in the treatment of hematologic and solid malignancies. Cancer. 2005, 104: 1794-1797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Davis CD, Tsuji PA, Milner JA: Selenoproteins and cancer prevention. Annu Rev Nutr. 2012, 32: 73-95. Review,View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Carlet M, Janjetovic K, Rainer J, Schmidt S, Panzer-Grümayer R, Mann G, Prelog M, Meister B, Ploner C, Kofler R: Expression, regulation and function of phosphofructo-kinase/fructose-biphosphatases (PFKFBs) in glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 638-649.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kowalski W, Nocon D, Gamian A, Kołodziej J, Rakus D: Association of C-terminal region of phosphoglycerate mutase with glycolytic complex regulates energy production in cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2012, 227: 2613-2621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hulleman E, Kazemier KM, Holleman A, VanderWeele DJ, Rudin CM, Broekhuis MJ, Evans WE, Pieters R, Den Boer ML: Inhibition of glycolysis modulates prednisolone resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Blood. 2009, 113: 2014-2021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Footz TK, Brinkman-Mills P, Banting GS, Maier SA, Riazi MA, Bridgland L, Hu S, Birren B, Minoshima S, Shimizu N, Pan H, Nguyen T, Fang F, Fu Y, Ray L, Wu H, Shaull S, Phan S, Yao Z, Chen F, Huan A, Hu P, Wang Q, Loh P, Qi S, Roe BA, McDermid HE: Analysis of the cat eye syndrome critical region in humans and the region of conserved synteny in mice: a search for candidate genes at or near the human chromosome 22 pericentromere. Genome Res. 2001, 11: 1053-1070.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Michaud J, Simpson KM, Escher R, Buchet-Poyau K, Beissbarth T, Carmichael C, Ritchie ME, Schütz F, Cannon P, Liu M, Shen X, Ito Y, Raskind WH, Horwitz MS, Osato M, Turner DR, Speed TP, Kavallaris M, Smyth GK, Scott HS: Integrative analysis of RUNX1 downstream pathways and target genes. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 363-380.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang N, Koh GS, Lim JY, Kham SK, Ariffin H, Chew FT, Yeoh AE: BIM is a prognostic biomarker for early prednisolone response in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2011, 39: 321-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Trembley JH, Chen Z, Unger G, Slaton J, Kren BT, Van Waes C, Ahmed K: Emergence of protein kinase CK2 as a key target in cancer therapy. Biofactors. 2010, 36: 187-195.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Polak R, Buitenhuis M: The PI3K/PKB signaling module as key regulator of hematopoiesis: implications for therapeutic strategies in leukemia. Blood. 2012, 119: 911-923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ernst A, Avvakumov G, Tong J, Fan Y, Zhao Y, Alberts P, Persaud A, Walker JR, Neculai AM, Neculai D, Vorobyov A, Garg P, Beatty L, Chan PK, Juang YC, Landry MC, Yeh C, Zeqiraj E, Karamboulas K, Allali-Hassani A, Vedadi M, Tyers M, Moffat J, Sicheri F, Pelletier L, Durocher D, Raught B, Rotin D, Yang J, Moran MF, et al: A strategy for modulation of enzymes in the ubiquitin system. Science. 2013, 339: 590-595.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider P, Costa O, Legrand E, Bigot D, Lecleire S, Grassi V, Vannier JP, Vasse M: In vitro secretion of matrix metalloprotease 9 is a prognostic marker in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2010, 34: 24-31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gandemer V, Chevret S, Petit A, Vermylen C, Leblanc T, Michel G, Schmitt C, Lejars O, Schneider P, Demeocq F, Bader-Meunier B, Bernaudin F, Perel Y, Auclerc MF, Cayuela JM, Leverger G, Baruchel A, : Excellent prognosis of late relapses of ETV6/RUNX1-positive childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: lessons from the FRALLE 93 protocol. Haematologica. 2012, 97: 1743-1750.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Dongen JJ, Macintyre EA, Gabert JA, Delabesse E, Rossi V, Saglio G, Gottardi E, Rambaldi A, Dotti G, Griesinger F, Parreira A, Gameiro P, Diáz MG, Malec M, Langerak AW, San Miguel JF, Biondi A: Standardized RT-PCR analysis of fusion gene transcripts from chromosome aberrations in acute leukemia for detection of minimal residual disease. Report of the BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: investigation of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia. Leukemia. 1999, 13: 1901-1928.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider P, Vasse M, Corbière C, Legrand E, Marie-Cardine A, Boquet C, Vannier JP: Endostatin variations in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia-comparison with basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Leuk Res. 2007, 31: 629-638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tnani H, López I, Jouenne T, Vicienta CM: Protein composition analysis of oil bodies from maize embryos during germination. J Plant Physiol. 2011, 168: 510-513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Magdeldin S, Enany S, Yoshida Y, Xu B, Zhang Y, Zureena Z, Lokamani I, Yaoita E, Yamamoto T: Basics and recent advances of two dimensional-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Clin Proteomics. 2014, 11: 16-26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Costa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement