Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open Access

Proteomic analysis identifies highly expressed plasma membrane proteins for detection and therapeutic targeting of specific breast cancer subtypes

Clinical Proteomics201815:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-018-9206-0

  • Received: 29 March 2018
  • Accepted: 14 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an emphasis on personalizing breast cancer treatment in order to avoid the debilitating side effects caused by broad-spectrum chemotherapeutic drug treatment. Development of personalized medicine requires the identification of proteins that are expressed by individual tumors. Herein, we reveal the identity of plasma membrane proteins that are overexpressed in estrogen receptor α-positive, HER2-positive, and triple negative breast cancer cells. The proteins we identified are involved in maintaining protein structure, intracellular homeostasis, and cellular architecture; enhancing cell proliferation and invasion; and influencing cell migration. These proteins may be useful for breast cancer detection and/or treatment.

Keywords

  • Individualized medicine
  • Plasma membrane proteins
  • Proteomic analysis
  • Estrogen receptor α-positive breast cancer
  • HER2-positive breast cancer
  • Triple negative breast cancer
  • Diagnostic markers

Introduction

Much has been written about the promise of personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Tremendous strides could be made in cancer treatment if targeted therapies were developed for specific tumor subtypes rather than relying on broad-spectrum chemotherapeutic agents. To begin to meet this challenge, it will be necessary to identify proteins that are expressed in individual patient tumors so that targeted treatments can be developed. Some progress has been made in this regard in the identification of proteins that are expressed in different classes of breast cancer (BC) tumors [1, 2].

The majority of BC tumors express estrogen receptor α (ERα) and the progesterone receptor (PR). Estrogen receptor antagonists and aromatase inhibitors have been successfully utilized to treat these ERα-positive tumors [3]. Another class of BC tumors do not express ERα, but overexpress the plasma membrane (PM) protein kinase HER2 (receptor tyrosine-protein kinase HER2). Humanized antibodies that bind to HER2 and reduce proliferation of HER2-positive BC cells have been utilized as a targeted treatment for this class of BC tumor [4]. Unfortunately, there exists a class of BC tumors for which no targeted treatments exist. These BC tumors do not express ERα, PR, or HER2 and are referred to as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors. There is a pressing need to identify proteins that are expressed by individual BC tumors, especially TNBC tumors so that new, targeted treatments might be developed.

PM proteins make attractive therapeutic targets due to their accessibility and involvement with the initiation of critical cell signaling cascades [5]. As proof of concept, many targeted therapies approved or in development target cell surface proteins [6]. Importantly, novel immunotherapies can capitalize on abundant cell-surface markers that are specific for particular cancer subtypes [7, 8].

The proteins discussed herein are an addendum to a previous study [6] in an attempt to identify additional proteins that might be useful targets for personalized therapy. The earlier analysis examined overexpressed proteins in several categories, including tyrosine kinases, MHC class I proteins, cell adhesion proteins, GPCRs and G proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, intermediate filaments, tubulins, actins, and myosins. The proteins discussed below did not readily fall into these functional categories and are now being considered based on their expression across the clinical classes of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture

MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and SK-BR-3 cells, derived from pleural effusions (metastatic sites), and MCF-10A cells, derived from a benign fibrocystic mammary lesion, were originally obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and maintained as described [6]. Two TNBC cell lines, DT22 (basal claudin-low) and DT28 (basal-epithelial) were derived from dissociated primary tumors and maintained as described [6, 9].

Plasma membrane isolation

Purified PM were prepared using differential centrifugation followed by aqueous two-phase partitioning [6, 10, 11]. Briefly, ≥ 4 × 107 cells were harvested and pelleted in PBS at 4 °C, resuspended (108 cells/ml) in hypotonic buffer (0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaHCO3 with protease inhibitors), and the nuclei and intact cells were removed by low-speed centrifugation (10 min at 800×g). The supernatant was subjected to high-speed centrifugation (1 h at 100,000×g) to yield a crude membrane pellet. The pellet was resuspended in 200 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 and combined with the two-phase solution comprised of 6.6% dextran T500 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 6.6% w/w polyethylene glycol (Emerald Bio, Bainbridge Island, WA) in 200 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, vigorously mixed, spun (5 min at 1150×g), and the top phase containing PM was removed. The bottom phase was re-extracted with fresh dextran/polyethylene glycol buffer and combined with the first top phase. Finally, the pooled top phase was diluted with 5 volumes of 1 mM NaHCO3 and spun (1 h at 100,000×g). The PM pellets were flash frozen and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent MS analysis.

Mass spectrometry

Pellets from ultracentrifugation were resuspended in 1 ml extraction buffer (635626, Clontech, Mountain View, CA,), followed by precipitation of 100 μg of protein in 23% TCA. Acetone-washed pellets were resuspended in 60 μl digestion buffer (0.1% Rapigest (Waters, Milford, MA) plus 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate) and heated at 60 °C for 30 min. Proteins were reduced with 5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (C4706, Sigma) and alkylated with 10 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma). Proteins were then digested for 18 h at 37 °C in 1 μg trypsin (V5111, Promega, Madison, WI). Digestion was terminated by addition of 5% formic acid followed by a 30 min incubation at 37 °C. Debris was removed by centrifugation, 30 min at 18,000×g. MudPIT analysis was performed using an Accela HPLC pump (Thermo) and LTQ XL (Thermo) using an in-house built electrospray stage [12]. Protein and peptide identification were done with Integrated Proteomics Pipeline—IP2 (Integrated Proteomics Applications, San Diego, CA. http://www.integratedproteomics.com/). The tandem mass spectra were searched against a human protein database (UniprotKB, release 2018_07) with reversed sequences using ProLuCID (version 1.3.5) [1315]. The search space included half and fully tryptic peptide candidates that fell within the mass tolerance window with no miscleavage constraint. Carbamidomethylation (+57.02146 Da) of cysteine was considered as a static modification. Data was filtered using DTASelect v2.0.49 with a protein false positive rate of 1%.

TCGA analysis

TCGA data was extracted and analyzed as described [16]. Briefly, level 3 gene expression (microarray) data derived from breast invasive carcinoma were downloaded from the TCGA Research Network (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) and parsed with a script generated at the University of Illinois Life Sciences Office of Information Technology. Data from 321 estrogen receptor positive, 53 HER2 positive, and 80 TNBC tumors were used to generate boxplots in GraphPad Prism (version 5.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA, www.graphpad.com).

Results and discussion

To identify proteins expressed by specific classes of BC tumors, we utilized MCF-7 cells, (ERα and PR positive), SK-BR-3 cells (HER2 overexpression), and MDA-MB-231 cells, which do not express ERα, PR, or HER2 and are classified as TNBC cells. Each of these cell lines has been extensively characterized and their gene expression profiles are similar to their respective tumor subtypes [17, 18]. In addition, two more recently isolated TNBC cell lines, DT22 and DT28 cells [6, 9, 16] were included to more carefully characterize the behavior of primary TNBC tumors. Using microarray analysis, the PAM50 classifier [19], and the claudin-low predictor [20], DT22 is classified as basal-claudin-low, and DT28 is classified as basal [9]. MCF-10A cells were included as a benign control [21, 22].

To exploit the fact that PM proteins make attractive therapeutic targets, PM proteins were isolated from each cell line and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was used to define the PM proteomes and identify potential targets [6]. Data was parsed using spectral counts (SC), normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) [23], which corrects for the effect of protein length on spectral counts, and exponentially modified protein abundance index (EMPAI) [24], which is useful in quantifying protein content in complex mixtures (Additional file 1: Table S1). Biological validation of the MS data was previously performed using RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and Western blotting analyses, and a close correlation was observed between the SC values and mRNA and protein levels in each of the cell lines [6]. Thus, the MS data generated is semi-quantitative in nature and can yield insights into differences and similarities among the BC and control cell lines.

Although a large number of proteins with higher PM expression have been previously described [6], this paper describes additional proteins that may be useful in targeted BC treatment or tracking disease progression and/or recurrence. Two factors were considered in selecting these proteins for further investigation, including the total number of SCs detected and also the number of SCs detected in a BC cell line compared to the MCF-10A control. Four BC PM proteins that have been successfully targeted or are in clinical trials as potential targets were examined in our data, including HER1 (EGFR), HER2 (ERBB2), HER3 (ERBB3), and the tyrosine-protein kinase receptor UFO (AXL) (Table 1). We decided upon a cut-off of 100 SCs for consideration of a protein, a value well above the 53 and 58 SCs seen for ERBB3 and AXL, respectively. Since targetability requires that the malignant cells stand out from normal cells, we also examined the ratio of SCs between the BC cells and control MCF-10A cells. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) provided the cut-off value of 8, thus requiring that malignant expression be at least eightfold higher than control expression to be considered.
Table 1

Targeted therapies approved or in clinical trials

Therapeutics and their targets

Therapeutic

Gene target

MCF-7

SKBR3

DT22

DT28

MB-231

MCF-10A

Herceptin

ERBB2

0

276

45

3

3

0

Gefitinib, Tarceva, Poziotinib

EGFR

0

22

11

27

88

10

MM-111, Seribantumab, U3-1402

ERBB3

3

6

52

3

0

0

Bemcentinib

AXL

0

0

0

0

58

0

The therapeutic, gene target, and number of SCs identified in each cell line for that target are listed. MB-231 indicates MDA-MB-231 cells

ERα-positive cells

AGR2 (anterior gradient protein 2 homolog) was highly expressed in MCF-7 cells with 135 SCs (Table 2), but was not detected in the PM of any of the other BC cell lines. AGR2 is a member of the protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) family, is involved in protein folding and disulfide exchange reactions, and has been implicated in cancer cell proliferation and progression [25, 26]. There is evidence to suggest that ERα induces AGR2 expression [27] and that higher AGR2 levels are associated with tamoxifen resistance in advanced disease [28]. To investigate how our MS results relate to clinical data, the gene expression of AGR2 was analyzed using microarray data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Consistent with our findings in MCF-7 cells, the expression of AGR2 is higher in ERα-positive BC tumors than in HER2-positive or TNBC tumors (Fig. 1a). Gene expression of ERα in BC tumors is included for comparison, but note that ERα is predominantly a nuclear protein with minimal PM expression, as reflected in our data [29]. Interestingly, we previously demonstrated that another protein in the PDI family (P4HB) alters ERα structure and influences estrogen-regulated gene expression [30]. AGR2, which enhances BC cell proliferation and has been detected in circulating tumor cells, may be useful as a marker of metastasis [26].
Table 2

Highly expressed plasma membrane proteins in breast cancer cell lines

Overexpressed proteins identified

Gene

MCF-7

SK-BR-3

DT22

DT28

MB-231

MCF-10A

Protein

ERα-positive cells

 AGR2

135

0

0

0

0

0

Anterior gradient protein 2 homolog

 GCN1

107

37

81

52

32

7

eIF2-alpha kinase activator GCN1

HER2-positive cells

 ACLY

57

199

73

83

78

19

ATP-citrate synthase

 DHRS2

0

200

0

0

0

0

Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 2

 SUSD2

8

412

0

0

0

4

Sushi domain-containing protein 2

TNBC

 EEF2

85

57

103

52

75

9

Elongation factor 2

 TNC

0

0

105

6

0

0

Tenascin

 PSMA5

25

11

51

219

33

6

Proteasome subunit alpha type-5

 BASP1

0

2

0

0

140

2

Brain acid soluble protein 1

 SLC1A5

18

10

34

14

115

6

Neutral amino acid transporter B(0)

 ECPAS

59

71

109

118

44

6

Proteasome adapter and scaffold protein ECM29

 TCP1

16

66

106

109

74

8

T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha

ERα-positive and HER2-positive cells

 FASN

107

393

46

21

60

30

Fatty acid synthase

ERα-positive and TNBC cells

 PA2G4

129

84

54

130

26

15

Proliferation-associated protein 2G4

HER2-positive and TNBC cells

 AHNAK

91

426

931

142

1219

103

Neuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAK

 TPP2

45

119

150

41

58

6

Tripeptidyl-peptidase 2

Multiple cell types

 EEF1A1

894

834

576

486

560

34

Elongation factor 1-alpha 1

 EEF1A2

739

525

157

87

154

11

Elongation factor 1-alpha 2

The gene name, number of spectral counts identified in each cell line, and protein name are listed. SCs of more highly expressed proteins are bolditalic. MB-231 indicates MDA-MB-231 cells

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Gene expression in human BC tumors. Gene expression in ERα-positive BC, HER2-positive BC, and TNBC tumors are indicated in boxplots. Values are relative to normal breast tissue, with log2 Lowess normalized value > 0 indicating expression higher than and < 0 indicating expression lower than in normal tissue. Data are derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://cancergenome.nih.gov/). Indicated below each tumor subtype is the number of SCs identified by our proteomic analyses. Because TNBC SCs are derived from 3 cell lines, these values are sometimes presented as a range (panels b and c). ERα and HER2 (panels a and b, respectively) are provided for comparison. ***p < .001

GCN1 (eIF2-alpha kinase activator GCN1) is most highly expressed in MCF-7 cells (107 SCs) and has very low expression in MCF-10A cells (7 SCs). This protein activates the protein kinase GCN2 which orchestrates the cell’s response to amino acid starvation [31].

HER2-positive cells

Three proteins were more highly expressed in the HER2-positive SK-BR-3 cells than in the other BC cell lines. ACLY (ATP-citrate synthase) was highly expressed in SK-BR-3 cells (199 SCs) and is responsible for acetyl-CoA production and de novo lipid synthesis. ACLY has been implicated in promoting high rates of aerobic glycolysis and lipid synthesis in a variety of tumor cells and in increasing tumor cell aggression [32]. Because reduction of ACLY expression leads to arrest of tumor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, it has been suggested that this protein may be useful as a therapeutic target [33]. DHRS2 (dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 2) metabolizes a variety of steroids and other cellular components and was highly and exclusively expressed in SK-BR-3 cells (200 SCs). Increased DHRS2 expression has also been noted in prostate [34] and ovarian [35] cancer cells. SUSD2 (sushi domain-containing protein 2) is involved in cell adhesion and migration and was highly expressed in SK-BR-3 cells (412 SCs). Interestingly, SUSD2 expression closely resembles the expression of HER2 in BC tumors (Fig. 1b). Elevated expression of SUSD2 is associated with increased tumor invasion and decreased survival in a mouse model [36]. Silencing of SUSD2 expression in endometrial carcinoma cells results in cell death [37]. Thus, it has been suggested that reducing expression of this protein might be a therapeutically useful strategy. In contrast to its effect on BC and endometrial cells, SUSD2 may function as a tumor suppressor in both kidney and lung cancer cells [38].

TNBC cells

There is a tremendous need to identify proteins that are overexpressed in TNBC tumors in order to develop targeted treatments for these patients. We identified 7 proteins that are most highly represented in TNBC cells. DT22 cells overexpressed two of these proteins. EEF2 (elongation factor 2; 103 SCs) is overexpressed in multiple cancer types and is a promising immunotherapy target [39]. TNC (tenascin; 105 SCs), an extracellular matrix protein involved in neuronal guidance and axonal outgrowth in the brain, has been implicated in the metastasis of breast cancer to the lungs [40]. PSMA5 (proteasome subunit alpha type-5) is highly expressed only in DT28 cells (219 SCs). Increased proteasome activity has been noted in breast and other cancer types, providing protection from apoptosis, thereby yielding additional avenues for drug intervention [41].

Like the DT22 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells overexpressed two proteins, including BASP1 (brain acid soluble protein 1; 140 SCs). We were intrigued by the fact that, like TNC, BASP1 is involved in neuronal guidance in the brain [42, 43]. In addition, BASP1 is involved in terminal end bud formation during mammary gland development [44]. It seems possible that these two proteins may also play a role in tumor cell infiltration. SLC1A5 (neutral amino acid transporter B(0); 115 SCs), mediates uptake of glutamine in TNBC [45]. SLC proteins by definition are membrane transport proteins. Interestingly, another SLC protein, SLC39A6 is a PAM50 gene [46] and is most likely a Zn transporter [25]. The modified and excessive nutritional needs of cancer cells likely require increased expression of multiple SLC proteins.

Two proteins were more highly expressed in the TNBC cell lines derived from primary tumors, DT22 and DT28. The first of these, ECPAS (proteasome adapter and scaffold protein ECM29; 109 and 118 SCs, respectively), is a component of the 26S proteasome. Lower levels of ECM29 predict a better outcome in breast cancer patients. In fact, the therapeutic action of palbociclib involves activation of the proteasome through the loss of ECM29, resulting in cell senescence and decreased cell proliferation [47]. Also more highly expressed by DT22 and DT28 cells is TCP1 (T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha; 106 and 109 SCs respectively). This protein is part of the protein folding CCT chaperone complex that has generated interest as a therapeutic target in small cell lung cancer [48].

The fact that these seven proteins differentially distribute over the three different TNBC cell lines and that 5 of the proteins were overexpressed by just one TNBC cell line reflect that the TNBC category is heterogeneous and requires further definition [49].

Multiple BC cell types

Although a number of the proteins we identified were expressed in just one class of BC cells (ERα-positive, HER2-positive, or TNBC cells), some proteins were overexpressed in more than one BC cell type.

FASN (fatty acid synthase) was highly expressed by MCF-7 (107 SCs) and SK-BR-3 (393 SCs) cells and is also more highly expressed in ERα-positive and HER2-positive mammary tumors (Fig. 1c). FASN catalyzes the synthesis of fatty acids that are required for membrane production in rapidly dividing cells and has been designated a cancer biomarker [50]. Interestingly, while overexpression of FASN has been linked to aberrant cellular architecture, reducing expression of this protein restores nearly normal cellular architecture [51].

PA2G4 (proliferation-associated protein 2G4) was more highly expressed in ERα-positive MCF-7 (129 SCs) and DT28 TNBC (130 SCs) cells. Elevated PA2G4 expression in mammary tumors is associated with decreased patient survival [52, 53]. In contrast, reduced PA2G4 expression is associated with increased cell proliferation and reduced survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [54].

Two proteins were highly expressed in HER2-positive and TNBC cells. AHNAK (neuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAK) was the most highly expressed PM protein identified in our study and was especially high in two of the TNBC cell lines, DT22 (931 SCs) and MDA-MB-231 (1219 SCs) cells. The number of AHNAK SCs in these cells was far greater than detected in MCF-10A cells (103 SCs). ANHAK was also highly expressed in HER2-positive SK-BR-3 cells (426 SCs). It has been suggested that AHNAK functions as a tumor suppressor in TNBC cells by decreasing cell proliferation and tumor invasion [55] and that increased expression of this protein may indicate a more favorable prognosis. Consistent with this idea, decreased AHNAK expression is associated with a poor outcome in melanoma patients [56]. SK-BR-3 and DT22 cells also share high expression of TPP2 (tripeptidyl-peptidase 2; 119 and 150 SCs, respectively), a multi-functional enzyme that controls of ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation [57].

The eukaryotic translation elongation factors 1-alpha proteins EEF1A1 and EEF1A2 play critical roles in protein synthesis. Peptides from both elongation factors are highly represented in all of the breast cancer cell types whereas the non-transformed MCF-10A cells expressed substantially lower levels of both EEF1A proteins. The overexpression of EEF1A2 in breast cancer results in activation of PIK-Akt-STAT3 pathways and formation of filopodia, resulting in oncogenesis and metastasis [58]. Elevated expression of these elongation factors has also been noted in human ovarian and lung cancer [58].

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings suggest that the increased expression of specific proteins in BC cells helps to maintain the structural integrity of cellular proteins (AGR2, TCP1) and cellular architecture (FASN), promote the synthesis and procurement of fatty acids and other substrates required for generation of rapidly dividing cells (ACLY, SLC1A5, FASN, GCN1), enhance tumor cell proliferation (AGR2, ACLY, EEF2, EEF1A1, EEF1A2) and invasion (SUSD2), influence tumor cell migration (BASP, TNC), and maintain intracellular homeostasis (PSMA5, ECPAS). The importance of individual proteins in oncogenesis and tumor progression has been demonstrated by inhibiting the expression of proteins in BC cells. For example, inhibiting expression of ACLY [33] reduces BC cell proliferation and knocking down FASN helps to restore normal mammary cellular architecture [51].

Developing targeted treatments for BC tumors would appear to be a daunting task. However, a recurring theme in our findings was that proteins, which were highly expressed in the BC cell lines we examined, are also highly expressed in other types of cancer. Thus, by characterizing tumors by the proteins they express, rather than the tissue of origin, it may be possible to identify therapeutic targets and treatments that would be useful for a variety of tumors. For example, Trastuzumab, which has been utilized as a first line treatment for HER2-positive BC tumors, has also been used to treat HER2-positive gastric cancer [59]. Likewise, the FASN inhibitor C75 has significant antitumor effects on BC cells as well as prostate and ovarian cancer cells [60]. It should be noted, however, that the effect of a protein or an inhibitor can vary in tumors that originate in different tissues.

The veracity of our findings is supported by the fact that clinical trials are currently underway to test the efficacy of novel inhibitors to limit disease progression. A new FASN inhibitor, TVB-2640, is currently being tested for its effect on mammary, colon, prostate, and lung tumors and leukemia (clinicaltrials.gov). Our studies would predict that this inhibitor would be most effective in HER2-positive BC cells. The effectiveness of radioactively-labeled antibodies to TNC is being examined in patients with BC, glioblastoma, and head and neck tumors (clinicaltrials.gov). In addition to their importance as therapeutic targets, some of the highly expressed proteins we have identified (SUSD2, FASN, AHNAK, EEF1A1, EEF1A2) may be useful as diagnostic biomarkers so that disease progression and recurrence might be followed in patients using liquid biopsies. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the identification of highly abundant cell surface proteins that are unique to an individual’s cancer could result in personalized immunotherapies that are highly effective in controlling or eradicating deadly metastatic disease.

Abbreviations

BC: 

Breast cancer

EMPAI: 

Exponentially modified protein abundance index

ERα: 

Estrogen receptor alpha

HER2: 

Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase HER2

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

NSAF: 

Normalized spectral abundance factor

PDI: 

Protein disulfide isomerase

PM: 

Plasma membrane

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

SC: 

Spectral count

TNBC: 

Triple negative breast cancer

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YSZ, JJM, and AMN designed the experiments. YSZ, JJM, and PGT performed the experiments. YSZ, JJM, and AMN analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dorraya El-Ashry for providing the DT22 and DT28 cells, Jeff Haas for assistance in data analysis, Dr. Lori Raetzman for scientific guidance, Dr. Benita Katzenellenbogen for contributions, and Wanda Plawer for assistance in manuscript preparation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files. In addition, the mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to  the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [61] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD010395) [http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/cgi/GetDataset].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

YSZ and AMN were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01 DK053884 (to AMN). PGT, JJM, and JRY were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences 8 P41 GM103533 and the National Institute on Aging R01AG027463 (to JRY). YSZ was also supported in part by BCRF-083 to Benita Katzenellenbogen from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
(2)
Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA

References

  1. Hsu JL, Hung MC. The role of HER2, EGFR, and other receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):575–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shao F, Sun H, Deng CX. Potential therapeutic targets of triple-negative breast cancer based on its intrinsic subtype. Oncotarget. 2017;8(42):73329–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brufsky AM. Long-term management of patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: concepts for sequential and combination endocrine-based therapies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;59:22–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab–mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):39–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuhlmann L, Cummins E, Samudio I, Kislinger T. Cell-surface proteomics for the identification of novel therapeutic targets in cancer. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2018;15(3):259–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ziegler YS, Moresco JJ, Tu PG, Yates JR 3rd, Nardulli AM. Plasma membrane proteomics of human breast cancer cell lines identifies potential targets for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102341.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee JK, Bangayan NJ, Chai T, Smith BA, Pariva TE, Yun S, Vashisht A, Zhang Q, Park JW, Corey E, et al. Systemic surfaceome profiling identifies target antigens for immune-based therapy in subtypes of advanced prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(19):E4473–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Orentas RJ, Yang JJ, Wen X, Wei JS, Mackall CL, Khan J. Identification of cell surface proteins as potential immunotherapy targets in 12 pediatric cancers. Front Oncol. 2012;2:194.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Drews-Elger K, Brinkman JA, Miller P, Shah SH, Harrell JC, da Silva TG, Ao Z, Schlater A, Azzam DJ, Diehl K, et al. Primary breast tumor-derived cellular models: characterization of tumorigenic, metastatic, and cancer-associated fibroblasts in dissociated tumor (DT) cultures. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144(3):503–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morre DM, Morre DJ. Aqueous two-phase partition applied to the isolation of plasma membranes and Golgi apparatus from cultured mammalian cells. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000;743(1–2):377–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schindler J, Lewandrowski U, Sickmann A, Friauf E, Nothwang HG. Proteomic analysis of brain plasma membranes isolated by affinity two-phase partitioning. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(2):390–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR 3rd. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2001;73(23):5683–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. McDonald WH, Tabb DL, Sadygov RG, MacCoss MJ, Venable J, Graumann J, Johnson JR, Cociorva D, Yates JR 3rd. MS1, MS2, and SQT-three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18(18):2162–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J Proteome Res. 2003;2(1):43–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu T, Park SK, Venable JD, Wohlschlegel JA, Diedrich JK, Cociorva D, Lu B, Liao L, Hewel J, Han X, et al. ProLuCID: an improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. J Proteomics. 2015;129:16–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ziegler YS, Moresco JJ, Yates JR 3rd, Nardulli AM. Integration of breast cancer secretomes with clinical data elucidates potential serum markers for disease detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0158296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross DT, Perou CM. A comparison of gene expression signatures from breast tumors and breast tissue derived cell lines. Dis Markers. 2001;17(2):99–109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandberg R, Ernberg I. Assessment of tumor characteristic gene expression in cell lines using a tissue similarity index (TSI). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(6):2052–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chia SK, Bramwell VH, Tu D, Shepherd LE, Jiang S, Vickery T, Mardis E, Leung S, Ung K, Pritchard KI, Parker JS, Bernard PS, Perou CM, Ellis MJ, Nielsen TO. A 50-Gene Intrinsic Subtype Classifier for Prognosis and Prediction of Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(16):4465–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Prat A, Parker JS, Karginova O, Fan C, Livasy C, Herschkowitz JI, He X, Perou CM. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):R68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods. 2003;30(3):256–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Peterson WD Jr, Brenz R, McGrath CM, Russo J, Pauley RJ, Jones RF, Brooks SC. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res. 1990;50(18):6075–86.Google Scholar
  23. Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res. 2006;5(9):2339–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Shinoda K, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. emPAI Calc—for the estimation of protein abundance from large-scale identification data by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(4):576–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Safran M, Dalah I, Alexander J, Rosen N, Iny Stein T, Shmoish M, Nativ N, Bahir I, Doniger T, Krug H, et al. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford). 2010;2010:baq020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Salmans ML, Zhao F, Andersen B. The estrogen-regulated anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) protein in breast cancer: a potential drug target and biomarker. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(2):204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Verma S, Salmans ML, Geyfman M, Wang H, Yu Z, Lu Z, Zhao F, Lipkin SM, Andersen B. The estrogen-responsive Agr2 gene regulates mammary epithelial proliferation and facilitates lobuloalveolar development. Dev Biol. 2012;369(2):249–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hrstka R, Brychtova V, Fabian P, Vojtesek B, Svoboda M. AGR2 predicts tamoxifen resistance in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Dis Markers. 2013;35(4):207–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedram A, Razandi M, Levin ER. Nature of functional estrogen receptors at the plasma membrane. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(9):1996–2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz-Norton JR, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Nardulli AM. Protein disulfide isomerase serves as a molecular chaperone to maintain estrogen receptor alpha structure and function. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(9):1982–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Anda S, Zach R, Grallert B. Activation of Gcn2 in response to different stresses. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Icard P, Lincet H. The reduced concentration of citrate in cancer cells: an indicator of cancer aggressiveness and a possible therapeutic target. Drug Resist Updat. 2016;29:47–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zaidi N, Swinnen JV, Smans K. ATP-citrate lyase: a key player in cancer metabolism. Cancer Res. 2012;72(15):3709–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Saraon P, Cretu D, Musrap N, Karagiannis GS, Batruch I, Drabovich AP, van der Kwast T, Mizokami A, Morrissey C, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Quantitative proteomics reveals that enzymes of the ketogenic pathway are associated with prostate cancer progression. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12(6):1589–601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Song J, Shih Ie M, Chan DW, Zhang Z. Suppression of annexin A11 in ovarian cancer: implications in chemoresistance. Neoplasia. 2009;11(6):605–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson AP, Evans RL, Egland KA. Multiple functions of sushi domain containing 2 (SUSD2) in breast tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11(1):74–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang S, Zeng N, Alowayed N, Singh Y, Cheng A, Lang F, Salker MS. Downregulation of endometrial mesenchymal marker SUSD2 causes cell senescence and cell death in endometrial carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183681.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cheng Y, Wang X, Wang P, Li T, Hu F, Liu Q, Yang F, Wang J, Xu T, Han W. SUSD2 is frequently downregulated and functions as a tumor suppressor in RCC and lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(7):9919–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Oji Y, Tatsumi N, Fukuda M, Nakatsuka S, Aoyagi S, Hirata E, Nanchi I, Fujiki F, Nakajima H, Yamamoto Y, et al. The translation elongation factor eEF2 is a novel tumor-associated antigen overexpressed in various types of cancers. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(5):1461–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, Zhang XH, Vanharanta S, Tavazoie SF, Morris PG, Downey RJ, Manova-Todorova K, Brogi E, Massague J. Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat Med. 2011;17(7):867–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Arlt A, Bauer I, Schafmayer C, Tepel J, Muerkoster SS, Brosch M, Roder C, Kalthoff H, Hampe J, Moyer MP, et al. Increased proteasome subunit protein expression and proteasome activity in colon cancer relate to an enhanced activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Oncogene. 2009;28(45):3983–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ostroumova OS, Schagina LV, Mosevitsky MI, Zakharov VV. Ion channel activity of brain abundant protein BASP1 in planar lipid bilayers. FEBS J. 2011;278(3):461–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu D, Cook MC, Shin DM, Silva DG, Marshall J, Toellner KM, Havran WL, Caroni P, Cooke MP, Morse HC, et al. Axon growth and guidance genes identify T-dependent germinal centre B cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86(1):3–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Morris JS, Stein T, Pringle MA, Davies CR, Weber-Hall S, Ferrier RK, Bell AK, Heath VJ, Gusterson BA. Involvement of axonal guidance proteins and their signaling partners in the developing mouse mammary gland. J Cell Physiol. 2006;206(1):16–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. van Geldermalsen M, Wang Q, Nagarajah R, Marshall AD, Thoeng A, Gao D, Ritchie W, Feng Y, Bailey CG, Deng N, et al. ASCT2/SLC1A5 controls glutamine uptake and tumour growth in triple-negative basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35(24):3201–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, Davies S, Fauron C, He X, Hu Z, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1160–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Miettinen TP, Peltier J, Hartlova A, Gierlinski M, Jansen VM, Trost M, Bjorklund M. Thermal proteome profiling of breast cancer cells reveals proteasomal activation by CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. EMBO J. 2018;37(10):1–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Carr AC, Khaled AS, Bassiouni R, Flores O, Nierenberg D, Bhatti H, Vishnubhotla P, Manuel JP, Santra S, Khaled AR. Targeting chaperonin containing TCP1 (CCT) as a molecular therapeutic for small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(66):110273–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Abramson VG, Mayer IA. Molecular heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2014;6(3):154–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Flavin R, Peluso S, Nguyen PL, Loda M. Fatty acid synthase as a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Future Oncol. 2010;6(4):551–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Corominas-Faja B, Vellon L, Cuyas E, Buxo M, Martin-Castillo B, Serra D, Garcia J, Lupu R, Menendez JA. Clinical and therapeutic relevance of the metabolic oncogene fatty acid synthase in HER2+ breast cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2017;32(7):687–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson A, Kampf C, Sjostedt E, Asplund A, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M, Zwahlen M, Kampf C, Wester K, Hober S, et al. Towards a knowledge-based human protein atlas. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(12):1248–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Hu B, Xiong Y, Ni R, Wei L, Jiang D, Wang G, Wu D, Xu T, Zhao F, Zhu M, Wan C. The downregulation of ErbB3 binding protein 1 (EBP1) is associated with poor prognosis and enhanced cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;396(1–2):175–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Chen B, Wang J, Dai D, Zhou Q, Guo X, Tian Z, Huang X, Yang L, Tang H, Xie X. AHNAK suppresses tumour proliferation and invasion by targeting multiple pathways in triple-negative breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheppard HM, Feisst V, Chen J, Print C, Dunbar PR. AHNAK is downregulated in melanoma, predicts poor outcome, and may be required for the expression of functional cadherin-1. Melanoma Res. 2016;26(2):108–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiemhoefer A, Stargardt A, van der Linden WA, Renner MC, van Kesteren RE, Stap J, Raspe MA, Tomkinson B, Kessels HW, Ovaa H, et al. Tripeptidyl peptidase II mediates levels of nuclear phosphorylated ERK1 and ERK2. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(8):2177–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Abbas W, Kumar A, Herbein G. The eEF1A proteins: at the crossroads of oncogenesis, apoptosis, and viral infections. Front Oncol. 2015;5:75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Apicella M, Corso S, Giordano S. Targeted therapies for gastric cancer: failures and hopes from clinical trials. Oncotarget. 2017;8(34):57654–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu H, Liu JY, Wu X, Zhang JT. Biochemistry, molecular biology, and pharmacology of fatty acid synthase, an emerging therapeutic target and diagnosis/prognosis marker. Int J Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;1(1):69–89.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, Mayer G, Perez-Riverol Y, Reisinger F, Ternent T, Xu Q-W, Wang R, Hermjakob H, 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D447–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement